Effective Repetition Decision in Buchanan v Jennings

Procedure and Privileges Committee (2005 - 2008)· 13 April 2006general_report

The WA Procedure and Privileges Committee investigated the implications of the Buchanan v Jennings decision on parliamentary privilege, specifically concerning 'effective repetition' in defamation cases. The report recommends amending the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1891 to prevent parliamentary proceedings from being used to establish what was 'effectively' said outside Parliament. It also suggests the Attorney General seek a uniform approach across Australia on this matter.

Impact

The recommendations aim to protect freedom of speech in Parliament and prevent a chilling effect on public debate. It affects members of Parliament, witnesses before committees, and the media.

justicepublic_sectorparliamentary privilegeeffective repetitiondefamationfreedom of speechBuchanan v Jenningslegal liabilityparliamentary proceedingsStanding Committee of Attorneys GeneralLegislative AssemblyAttorney General

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more