⚖️
Inquiry into why electronic monitoring was not applied in a family violence case despite legislative reforms.
🟡 Medium · Speech18 November 2025 · 576 words
Why wasn't electronic monitoring used in a family violence case despite law changes?
Government defends electronic monitoring policy after a family violence case raises concerns.
“I am informed that in this circumstance, electronic monitoring was not mandatory because the accused was not subject to a family violence restraining order (FVRO) before the alleged offence took place.”
👎 negative· defensive🌡️ warm
Members who spoke
Cook, RogerMettam, Libby
Topics
family violenceelectronic monitoringbaillaw reformcrime
Legislation Referenced
Bills
Family Violence Legislation Reform Act
· 18 November 2025
🏛️ Related Debate
⚡
Government promoting renewable energy, highlighting household solar uptake, battery schemes, and local battery manufacturing to strengthen the economy.
Speech · 18 November 2025
🌉
Closure of the recently opened Boorloo Bridge due to a casing issue, prompting inspection and repairs.
Speech · 18 November 2025
🚢
AUKUS agreement's impact on WA's defence capability, job creation, and bipartisan support is debated, with internal opposition party dynamics highlighted.
Speech · 18 November 2025
🏎️
Inquiry regarding the release of the Burswood Park racetrack project's business case and its costs. Summary will be published.
Speech · 18 November 2025
⛴️
Expansion of the Swan River ferry system is underway, facing opposition regarding location and environmental impact.
Speech · 18 November 2025
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.