❓ This parliamentary question concerns the listing of places on the State Heritage Register. It details the Heritage Council's recommendations, the Minister's decisions, and objections from property owners.
AnsweredQoN 2283Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) rejected; and (c) successfully listed?
(c) successfully listed?
(c) successfully listed?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
12 June 2007
Responded by
Minister for Heritage
Response time
34 days
(1) (a) The Heritage Council recommended to the Minister 8 places be made new entries and recommended 10 existing entries be made permanent in the State Register. (b)The Minister for Heritage declined 3 recommendations for new entries in the Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
and recommended 10 existing entries be made permanent in the State Register. (b)The Minister for Heritage declined 3 recommendations for new entries in the Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(b)The Minister for Heritage declined 3 recommendations for new entries in the Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
and recommended 10 existing entries be made permanent in the State Register. (b)The Minister for Heritage declined 3 recommendations for new entries in the Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(b)The Minister for Heritage declined 3 recommendations for new entries in the Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
Register. (c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(c) At the Minister for Heritage's direction the Heritage Council made 2 new entries and made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
made 7 existing entries permanent in the State Register. (2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(2) 1211 (3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(3) Nil (4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(4) 70 (5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(5) 15 (6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
(6) Proposals None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
None of the 8 owners of places recommended by the Heritage Council as new entries in the State Register objected to listing. The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owners of 5 of the 10 places proposed for permanent entry in the Register objected to listing. Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
Entries The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owners of one of the two new places entered in the Register objected to listing. The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
The owners of five of the seven places made permanent in the Register objected to listing.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.