A WA parliamentary question addresses a train failing to stop at a designated station, inquiring about the incident report, reasons for the failure, and preventative measures. The Minister confirms the incident, cites driver error, and outlines existing safety protocols and disciplinary actions.

AnsweredQoN 2864Legislative Assembly
Asked
1 June 2004
Portfolio
Planning and Infrastructure

QuestionView source ↗

(b) if so, what does that report state; (c) what were the reasons given for the failure of the train to halt at the designated station; (d) what measures have been put into place to ensure that this does not recur; (e) if the incident report records a different version of events to that outlined above, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament; and (f) if no incident report was lodged, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament?
(c) what were the reasons given for the failure of the train to halt at the designated station; (d) what measures have been put into place to ensure that this does not recur; (e) if the incident report records a different version of events to that outlined above, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament; and (f) if no incident report was lodged, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament?
(d) what measures have been put into place to ensure that this does not recur; (e) if the incident report records a different version of events to that outlined above, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament; and (f) if no incident report was lodged, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament?
(e) if the incident report records a different version of events to that outlined above, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament; and (f) if no incident report was lodged, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament?
(f) if no incident report was lodged, will the Minister undertake to investigate the matter and report back to Parliament?
(a) Yes. (b) Train Control Incident Report (No. 2) confirmed that the 10.10 am train from Perth did not stop at Stirling. (c) Driver error. The Driver was interviewed by his immediate Manager where it was ascertained that he had mistakenly thought he was running a different pattern service (ie. non stop). (d) An incident of this sort occurs very rarely. The Public Transport Authority estimates it would happen about once in every 50 000 services. At the commencement of each shift Train Drivers are informed of the stations they are required to stop at and that information is keyed into the on-board computer system which activates the audio message system. Train Drivers have been de-briefed to ensure that this type of incident does not occur again. Repetition of such an error by the driver would lead to reassessment, additional training and then the formal performance appraisal process, potentially leading to dismissal (e) Not applicable. (f) Not applicable.

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
25 August 2004
Responded by
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
85 days
(a) Yes. (b) Train Control Incident Report (No. 2) confirmed that the 10.10 am train from Perth did not stop at Stirling. (c) Driver error. The Driver was interviewed by his immediate Manager where it was ascertained that he had mistakenly thought he was running a different pattern service (ie. non stop). (d) An incident of this sort occurs very rarely. The Public Transport Authority estimates it would happen about once in every 50 000 services. At the commencement of each shift Train Drivers are informed of the stations they are required to stop at and that information is keyed into the on-board computer system which activates the audio message system. Train Drivers have been de-briefed to ensure that this type of incident does not occur again. Repetition of such an error by the driver would lead to reassessment, additional training and then the formal performance appraisal process, potentially leading to dismissal (e) Not applicable. (f) Not applicable.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more