A WA parliamentary question regarding the use of Uber accounts by departments and agencies under the Minister for Police and Road Safety is met with a refusal to answer, citing the frivolous nature of the question and the burden on public resources.

AnsweredQoN 1378Legislative Assembly
Asked
27 June 2017
Portfolio
Police; Road Safety

QuestionView source ↗

For each Department and Agency under the Minister’s control, do they currently operate an Uber account, and if so: (a) Since 1 January 2017 how much money has been charged to the account; (b) Since 1 January 2017 how many trips have been charged to the account; and (c) Since 1 January 2017 what is the most expensive trip which has been charged to the account?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
15 August 2017
Responded by
Minister for Police; Road Safety
Response time
6 days
On June 15, the Attorney General raised concerns about the frivolous nature of many of the questions the Member for Dawesville had lodged and the impact it was having on the resources of his departments and agencies.
In response the Member boasted; “he (the Attorney General) has signed himself up to another 50 questions over the weekend; I look forward to that!”
The Member has now made it clear many of his questions are not serious and appear to be lodged purely out of spite and designed to waste the time of public servants.
As such, I am not willing to continue to devote valuable Government resources entertaining this behaviour.
The Member has the opportunity to interrogate the budgets of agencies and departments through the normal budget estimates process.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more