Hon Adele Farina questions the Police Minister regarding FTE employee numbers in regional and remote policing, specifically addressing a shortfall in the 2013-14 budget projection and inquiring about the allocation of additional FTEs to specific police districts. The answer explains the shortfall but lacks specific details on future allocations.

AnsweredQoN 1358Legislative Council
Asked
12 August 2014
Portfolio
Police

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to Budget Paper No. 2, Volume 1 at page 372 "Services and Key Efficiency Indicators", line item Regional and remote policing services, and ask: (a) why was the 2013-14 budget projection of 1,988 full time equivalent (FTE) employees not met; (b) of the additional 52 FTE employees forecast for this financial year, will any be based in each of the South West Police District, Peel Police District and Great Southern Police District; and (c) if yes to (b), how many additional employees will be based in each district, at which police stations and in what positions?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
16 September 2014
Responded by
Attorney General representing the Minister for Police
Response time
35 days
(a) The variance between the 2013-14 budget projection and the estimated actual is due largely to the Voluntary Separation Scheme in 2013-14, which was not included in the 2013-14 budget projection.
(b)-(c) Yes. However, it is not possible to provide specific details of the allocations at this stage.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more