A WA parliamentary question seeks information on Crown land management, pest control programs, expenditure, and the allocation of funds between agricultural and environmental threats. The answer provides land area, program confirmation, and expenditure details, referencing attachments for specific pest species and further breakdowns.

AnsweredQoN 3220Legislative Assembly
Asked
15 September 2004
Portfolio
Indigenous Affairs

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Of those Government agencies for which you are ministerially responsible, which agencies own or otherwise control or are responsible for management of Crown land?
(2) What total area of land is subject to management control as described above?
(3) Do programs exist within those relevant Government agencies which control or manage Crown land to control or manage environmental and agricultural pests and weeds which occur on that land?
(4) If yes, what species of pests and weeds posing threats to the environment and/or to agriculture are known to occur on that land?
(5) What annual expenditure has been made by those relevant Government agencies over each of the past five years to control or manage environmental and/or agricultural pests and weeds?
(6) Of that expenditure, what proportion has been allocated to the control of declared pest and weed plants that pose threats to agriculture as opposed to those species posing serious threats to the environment?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
26 November 2004
Responded by
Minister for Indigenous Affairs
Response time
72 days
(2) 26.9 million hectares. (3) Yes, DIA land management program. (4) See Attachment 1. (5) Estimates (see Attachment 2 for details) : 2004 - $18,000 (to date) 2003 - $26,217 2002 - $2,650 2001 - $2,650 2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
(3) Yes, DIA land management program. (4) See Attachment 1. (5) Estimates (see Attachment 2 for details) : 2004 - $18,000 (to date) 2003 - $26,217 2002 - $2,650 2001 - $2,650 2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
(4) See Attachment 1. (5) Estimates (see Attachment 2 for details) : 2004 - $18,000 (to date) 2003 - $26,217 2002 - $2,650 2001 - $2,650 2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
(5) Estimates (see Attachment 2 for details) : 2004 - $18,000 (to date) 2003 - $26,217 2002 - $2,650 2001 - $2,650 2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
2004 - $18,000 (to date) 2003 - $26,217 2002 - $2,650 2001 - $2,650 2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
2003 - $26,217 2002 - $2,650 2001 - $2,650 2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
2002 - $2,650 2001 - $2,650 2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
2001 - $2,650 2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
2000 - $2,650 1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
1999 - $2,650 (6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).
(6) 31% of expenditure on Agricultural threats, 69% on Environmental threats (See appendix 2 for details).

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more