Question regarding events in 2002 or 2003, answered by referring to previous Hansard entries. A request for further summarisation was declined due to resource constraints and potential legal issues.

AnsweredQoN 32Legislative Council
Asked
29 March 2005
Portfolio
Community Development

QuestionView source ↗

(b) 2002; or (c) 2003?
(c) 2003?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
3 May 2005
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Community Development
Response time
35 days
Answers appeared on 7 - 9 May 2003 in Hansard. (1c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter.
(1c) Yes (2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter.
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a 'summary' of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more