❓ Opposition questions the delay in announcing timber volumes, impacting timber communities. Premier defends the delay, emphasizing a scientific and sustainable approach, criticizing the Opposition's lack of conservation commitment.
AnsweredQoN 729Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Government’s decision to restructure the timber industry. (1) Will the Premier explain why the Government has once again delayed the announcement on timber volumes, and continues to leave south west timber communities with an uncertain future? (2) Will the Premier admit that there is no reason the Government could not immediately announce an annual jarrah cut of 180 000 cubic metres, made up of indicative yield of 140 000 cubic metres plus 20 000 cubic metres of early step down and 20 000 cubic metres from moratorium areas? Dr GALLOP
AnswerView source ↗
(1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
(1) Will the Premier explain why the Government has once again delayed the announcement on timber volumes, and continues to leave south west timber communities with an uncertain future? (2) Will the Premier admit that there is no reason the Government could not immediately announce an annual jarrah cut of 180 000 cubic metres, made up of indicative yield of 140 000 cubic metres plus 20 000 cubic metres of early step down and 20 000 cubic metres from moratorium areas? Dr GALLOP replied: (1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
(2) Will the Premier admit that there is no reason the Government could not immediately announce an annual jarrah cut of 180 000 cubic metres, made up of indicative yield of 140 000 cubic metres plus 20 000 cubic metres of early step down and 20 000 cubic metres from moratorium areas? Dr GALLOP replied: (1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Dr GALLOP replied: (1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
(1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
(1) Will the Premier explain why the Government has once again delayed the announcement on timber volumes, and continues to leave south west timber communities with an uncertain future? (2) Will the Premier admit that there is no reason the Government could not immediately announce an annual jarrah cut of 180 000 cubic metres, made up of indicative yield of 140 000 cubic metres plus 20 000 cubic metres of early step down and 20 000 cubic metres from moratorium areas? Dr GALLOP replied: (1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
(2) Will the Premier admit that there is no reason the Government could not immediately announce an annual jarrah cut of 180 000 cubic metres, made up of indicative yield of 140 000 cubic metres plus 20 000 cubic metres of early step down and 20 000 cubic metres from moratorium areas? Dr GALLOP replied: (1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Dr GALLOP replied: (1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
(1)-(2) It is pretty clear that the Opposition has learnt nothing about good government in the 12 months it has been occupying those benches. The Government will achieve a sustainable timber cut in Western Australia that will be scientifically based. It will be done properly. Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Mr Barnett: The answer is 180 000 cubic metres. You know it and we know you know it. Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Dr GALLOP: The Leader of the Opposition indicates yet again why members opposite could not deal with this very important issue. It is because they did not bring to the debate two things: first, they did not have a genuine commitment to conservation values. The Labor Government has a genuine commitment to conservation values that led it to the conclusion that there should be an end to the logging of old-growth forests in Western Australia. What a decision that is for the future of the people in our State. In 2001, the Labor Government made what is without doubt the most significant conservation decision made in Western Australia’s history. Secondly, the Opposition did not bring to the discussion a proper scientific approach to these questions. My colleague the member for Maylands, then the opposition spokesperson on environment, and I said that on many occasions in this Parliament when debating this issue. A proper scientific approach is needed to deal with the consequence of these decisions. This Government introduced the idea of worker assistance and how to manage that. We introduced the proper scientific criteria to determine a sustainable yield, how it is measured and how best practice is incorporated. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the first time. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
The SPEAKER: Order! I call the member for Warren-Blackwood to order for the second time. Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Dr GALLOP: We are seeing again that lack of commitment to conservation values, and that lack of application of a proper scientific approach to this question. When this Government announces its proposals for the future use of timber in Western Australia, it will make sure that it gets it right. Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Mr Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
The SPEAKER: Order! Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Dr GALLOP: The time taken to do that will be the time required for a good decision. That is why we are on this side of the House and the Leader of the Opposition is on the other side of the House.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.