❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding an independent structural review of Rottnest Island accommodation. The member asks for the release of the report, names of involved parties, and architectural plans, questioning public confidence if the information is withheld.
AnsweredQoN 1205Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
ROTTNEST ISLAND ACCOMMODATION — EMERGENCY AUDIT
I refer to the minister’s answer to question without notice 1098 about the independent structural review of Rottnest Island accommodation. (1) Will the minister make public the full report of this review; and, if not, why not? (2) Will the minister reveal the name of the person or company that undertook the review; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the minister reveal the name of the company of the architect of those units reviewed on Rottnest Island and release the architectural plans for those units; and, if not, why not? (4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER
I refer to the minister’s answer to question without notice 1098 about the independent structural review of Rottnest Island accommodation. (1) Will the minister make public the full report of this review; and, if not, why not? (2) Will the minister reveal the name of the person or company that undertook the review; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the minister reveal the name of the company of the architect of those units reviewed on Rottnest Island and release the architectural plans for those units; and, if not, why not? (4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(1) Will the minister make public the full report of this review; and, if not, why not? (2) Will the minister reveal the name of the person or company that undertook the review; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the minister reveal the name of the company of the architect of those units reviewed on Rottnest Island and release the architectural plans for those units; and, if not, why not? (4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(2) Will the minister reveal the name of the person or company that undertook the review; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the minister reveal the name of the company of the architect of those units reviewed on Rottnest Island and release the architectural plans for those units; and, if not, why not? (4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(3) Will the minister reveal the name of the company of the architect of those units reviewed on Rottnest Island and release the architectural plans for those units; and, if not, why not? (4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(1) Will the minister make public the full report of this review; and, if not, why not? (2) Will the minister reveal the name of the person or company that undertook the review; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the minister reveal the name of the company of the architect of those units reviewed on Rottnest Island and release the architectural plans for those units; and, if not, why not? (4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(2) Will the minister reveal the name of the person or company that undertook the review; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the minister reveal the name of the company of the architect of those units reviewed on Rottnest Island and release the architectural plans for those units; and, if not, why not? (4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(3) Will the minister reveal the name of the company of the architect of those units reviewed on Rottnest Island and release the architectural plans for those units; and, if not, why not? (4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(4) Will the minister reveal the name of the builder of those units reviewed; and, if not, why not? (5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
(5) If the minister will not reveal the full report of this review, how can the public have confidence that all 583 pillars were inspected, that all Rottnest Island units are safe, and that the minister is doing her job? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. Unfortunately, I have been advised that one aspect of the answer is being clarified. If I get the answer before the end of question time, I will provide it; otherwise the member will receive the answer tomorrow. I am sorry for that, but it looks like something is just being double-checked.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.