❓ Question on Notice regarding a proof of concept pilot project initiated by the Department of Industry and Technology involving SMS services. The questions cover tendering, costs, negotiations with mobile providers, and agency charging for the service.
AnsweredQoN 2534Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) was this review and investigation put out for tender; (c) what is the cost of the evaluation; (d) have any negotiations taken place with mobile service providers, regarding the customer cost of such a service; (e) will the agencies be able to charge for the service; (f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(c) what is the cost of the evaluation; (d) have any negotiations taken place with mobile service providers, regarding the customer cost of such a service; (e) will the agencies be able to charge for the service; (f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(d) have any negotiations taken place with mobile service providers, regarding the customer cost of such a service; (e) will the agencies be able to charge for the service; (f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(e) will the agencies be able to charge for the service; (f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(g) if so, what is the cost?
(b) Yes, a contract was put to tender and awarded for the provision of the SMS service to facilitate the review. (c) The project contract was awarded for $21,300 up to a maximum cost of $50,000 for the life of the project. (d) No. Agencies agreed not to charge customers during the evaluation pilot. (e) At an agency’s discretion. (f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(c) The project contract was awarded for $21,300 up to a maximum cost of $50,000 for the life of the project. (d) No. Agencies agreed not to charge customers during the evaluation pilot. (e) At an agency’s discretion. (f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(d) No. Agencies agreed not to charge customers during the evaluation pilot. (e) At an agency’s discretion. (f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(e) At an agency’s discretion. (f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(g) Not applicable.
(c) what is the cost of the evaluation; (d) have any negotiations taken place with mobile service providers, regarding the customer cost of such a service; (e) will the agencies be able to charge for the service; (f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(d) have any negotiations taken place with mobile service providers, regarding the customer cost of such a service; (e) will the agencies be able to charge for the service; (f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(e) will the agencies be able to charge for the service; (f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(f) has a cost of service been set; and (g) if so, what is the cost?
(g) if so, what is the cost?
(b) Yes, a contract was put to tender and awarded for the provision of the SMS service to facilitate the review. (c) The project contract was awarded for $21,300 up to a maximum cost of $50,000 for the life of the project. (d) No. Agencies agreed not to charge customers during the evaluation pilot. (e) At an agency’s discretion. (f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(c) The project contract was awarded for $21,300 up to a maximum cost of $50,000 for the life of the project. (d) No. Agencies agreed not to charge customers during the evaluation pilot. (e) At an agency’s discretion. (f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(d) No. Agencies agreed not to charge customers during the evaluation pilot. (e) At an agency’s discretion. (f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(e) At an agency’s discretion. (f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(f) No. (g) Not applicable.
(g) Not applicable.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
1 June 2004
Response time
91 days
(a) A six month proof of concept pilot project was initiated in April 2002 by the Department of Industry and Technology. It involved Transperth, Fuel Watch (Department of Consumer and Employment Protection), LotteryWest, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Central TAFE.
(b) Yes, a contract was put to tender and awarded for the provision of the SMS service to facilitate the review.
(c) The project contract was awarded for $21,300 up to a maximum cost of $50,000 for the life of the project.
(d) No. Agencies agreed not to charge customers during the evaluation pilot.
(e) At an agency’s discretion.
(f) No.
(g) Not applicable.
(b) Yes, a contract was put to tender and awarded for the provision of the SMS service to facilitate the review.
(c) The project contract was awarded for $21,300 up to a maximum cost of $50,000 for the life of the project.
(d) No. Agencies agreed not to charge customers during the evaluation pilot.
(e) At an agency’s discretion.
(f) No.
(g) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.