❓ Hon Ray Halligan asked about bad debts written off by departments and agencies under the Minister for Goldfields-Esperance and Great Southern from 2001-2006. The answer provides details for the Goldfields-Esperance and Great Southern Development Commissions, noting minimal write-offs.
AnsweredQoN 3854Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
For each Department and Agency under the Minister’s control, including the Ministerial Office, and understanding that the write-off process is covered by the
Financial Administration and Audit Act
-
(1) What was the total amount of bad debts written off in each of the financial years -
(a) 2001-2002;
(b) 2002-2003;
(c) 2003-2004;
(d) 2004-2005; and
(e) 2005-2006?
(2) Were any of these debts above $10 000?
(3) If so, what is the name of the person or company owing the debt?
Financial Administration and Audit Act
-
(1) What was the total amount of bad debts written off in each of the financial years -
(a) 2001-2002;
(b) 2002-2003;
(c) 2003-2004;
(d) 2004-2005; and
(e) 2005-2006?
(2) Were any of these debts above $10 000?
(3) If so, what is the name of the person or company owing the debt?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
18 October 2006
Responded by
Minister for Local Government and Regional Development representing the Minister for Goldfields-Esperance and Great Southern
Response time
57 days
(b) 2002-2003; (c) 2003-2004; (d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006?
(c) 2003-2004; (d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006?
(d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006?
(e) 2005-2006?
Please refer to question on notice 3838. As the Member has stated, the write-off process is covered by the Financial Administration and Audit Act (FAAA). The FAAA has been in place since 1986 and similar provisions were in place in the Audit Act 1904. As a standard practice the agency would be expected to have taken all reasonable steps to recover and amend processes to avoid any recurrence prior to seeking approval to write-off. Compliance with the Financial Administration and Audit Act is audited annually by the Office of the Auditor General and any non compliance is reported to Parliament. Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
As the Member has stated, the write-off process is covered by the Financial Administration and Audit Act (FAAA). The FAAA has been in place since 1986 and similar provisions were in place in the Audit Act 1904. As a standard practice the agency would be expected to have taken all reasonable steps to recover and amend processes to avoid any recurrence prior to seeking approval to write-off. Compliance with the Financial Administration and Audit Act is audited annually by the Office of the Auditor General and any non compliance is reported to Parliament. Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
As a standard practice the agency would be expected to have taken all reasonable steps to recover and amend processes to avoid any recurrence prior to seeking approval to write-off. Compliance with the Financial Administration and Audit Act is audited annually by the Office of the Auditor General and any non compliance is reported to Parliament. Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
Compliance with the Financial Administration and Audit Act is audited annually by the Office of the Auditor General and any non compliance is reported to Parliament. Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
3) Not applicable
(c) 2003-2004; (d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006?
(d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006?
(e) 2005-2006?
Please refer to question on notice 3838. As the Member has stated, the write-off process is covered by the Financial Administration and Audit Act (FAAA). The FAAA has been in place since 1986 and similar provisions were in place in the Audit Act 1904. As a standard practice the agency would be expected to have taken all reasonable steps to recover and amend processes to avoid any recurrence prior to seeking approval to write-off. Compliance with the Financial Administration and Audit Act is audited annually by the Office of the Auditor General and any non compliance is reported to Parliament. Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
As the Member has stated, the write-off process is covered by the Financial Administration and Audit Act (FAAA). The FAAA has been in place since 1986 and similar provisions were in place in the Audit Act 1904. As a standard practice the agency would be expected to have taken all reasonable steps to recover and amend processes to avoid any recurrence prior to seeking approval to write-off. Compliance with the Financial Administration and Audit Act is audited annually by the Office of the Auditor General and any non compliance is reported to Parliament. Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
As a standard practice the agency would be expected to have taken all reasonable steps to recover and amend processes to avoid any recurrence prior to seeking approval to write-off. Compliance with the Financial Administration and Audit Act is audited annually by the Office of the Auditor General and any non compliance is reported to Parliament. Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
Compliance with the Financial Administration and Audit Act is audited annually by the Office of the Auditor General and any non compliance is reported to Parliament. Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission advises: (1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(1) Nil (2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(2) - (3) N/A Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
Great Southern Development Commission advises: (1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(1) (a) Nil (b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(b) $735 (c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
(c) - (e) Nil 2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
2) The Great Southern Development Commission had no debts over $10,000 for the years 2001/02 to 2005/06. 3) Not applicable
3) Not applicable
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.