❓ A parliamentary question regarding a potential breach of mining lease conditions related to vegetation clearing near residential properties. The Minister's answer clarifies the clearing was for fire prevention and safety.
AnsweredQoN 253Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to a incident which I understand occurred on or about November 14 2000 on Mining Lease 26/353 where a bobcat was operating pushing earth, soil and clearing vegetation within 100 metres of 30 Brownhill Road and 39 Brownhill Road without the written consent of the property occupiers -
(1) Have the holders/operators of Mining Lease 26/353 breached condition number 32 on the Mining Lease?
(2) If not, why not?
(3) If so, will the Minister or the Department issue forfeiture proceedings and impose a fine?
(4) Is it correct that condition number 32 on Mining Lease 26/353 states ‘Any alteration or expansion of operations within the lease boundaries beyond that outlined in the above documents not commencing until a plan of operations and a programme to safeguard the environment are submitted to the State Mining Engineer for his assessment and until his written approval to proceed has been obtained’?
(5) If not, will the Minister table a copy of all the conditions?
(1) Have the holders/operators of Mining Lease 26/353 breached condition number 32 on the Mining Lease?
(2) If not, why not?
(3) If so, will the Minister or the Department issue forfeiture proceedings and impose a fine?
(4) Is it correct that condition number 32 on Mining Lease 26/353 states ‘Any alteration or expansion of operations within the lease boundaries beyond that outlined in the above documents not commencing until a plan of operations and a programme to safeguard the environment are submitted to the State Mining Engineer for his assessment and until his written approval to proceed has been obtained’?
(5) If not, will the Minister table a copy of all the conditions?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
20 February 2002
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for State Development
Response time
146 days
(1) – (2) The operations using a bobcat on 14 November 2000 within 100 metres of 30 and 39 Brownhill Road was for the purpose of clearing vegetation to maintain a firebreak along and inside KCGM's safety fence line to protect its and any adjoining property from possible fires and as a general safety initiative. (3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) Not applicable.
(3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) Not applicable.
(4) Yes. (5) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
(3) Not applicable. (4) Yes. (5) Not applicable.
(4) Yes. (5) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.