Question seeking details on instances where goods or services were repeatedly supplied without a tender process within the Minister's portfolio, potentially violating procurement policies. The answer refers to another question, suggesting a possible connection or duplication of information requests.

AnsweredQoN 5919Legislative Assembly
Asked
10 December 2019
Portfolio
Tourism; Racing and Gaming; Small Business; Defence Issues; Citizenship and Multicultural Interests

QuestionView source ↗

Consistent with the State Supply Commission Open and Effective Competition Policy, in the past financial year was there any repeat (i.e. ad-hoc monthly supply without going to tender) good or service supplied to any agency, department, government trading enterprise or board within the Minister's portfolio with a monetary value from $50,000 up to $250,000, and if so: (a) What was the nature of the good or service repeatedly supplied; (b) What was the individual value of (a); (c) Why was this not put out to a tender process; and (d) What officers were responsible for the initial procurement and invoice payment of each supply?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
11 February 2020
Responded by
Minister for Tourism; Racing and Gaming; Small Business; Defence Issues; Citizenship and Multicultural Interests
Response time
1 days
Please refer to response to Legislative Assembly Question on Notice 5908

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more