Asks about the profile of prolific low-grade offenders (16+) regarding mental health and substance use, the evidence base for this profile, and the effectiveness and impacts of 'naming and shaming' such offenders.

AnsweredQoN 2663Legislative Council
Asked
11 August 2010
Portfolio
Attorney General

QuestionView source ↗

(1) What is the typical profile of prolific low grade offenders aged 16 or older, including but not limited to, -
(a) mental health status; and
(b) history of alcohol and/or substance use?
(2) What statistics, evidence or research is the answer to (1) based upon?
(3) Will the Minister please identify all statistics, evidence or research, of which he is aware regarding, -
(a) the effectiveness of ‘naming and shaming’ in reducing crime by such offenders; and
(b) any other impacts of ‘naming and shaming’ on such offenders?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
14 September 2010
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Attorney General
Response time
34 days
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on http://www.rtlib.com

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more