A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding the draft Greater Bunbury Region Scheme and the inclusion of the Picton deviation road reserve. The parliamentary secretary confirms the scheme does not depict the deviation and denies ministerial direction or agreement to include it.

AnsweredQoN 1117Legislative Council
Asked
20 November 2007
Portfolio
Planning and Infrastructure

QuestionView source ↗

DRAFT GREATER BUNBURY REGION SCHEME 1117. Hon NIGEL HALLETT to the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure: I refer to the draft greater Bunbury region scheme. (1) At the time the latest draft was presented to Parliament recently, did the City of Bunbury indicate formally that it supports or opposes the inclusion of the Picton deviation road reserve? (2) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 directed Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? (3) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 agreed to any request or proposal by Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? Hon ADELE FARINA

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) The greater Bunbury region scheme as it is now before Parliament does not depict the possible Picton deviation. (2)-(3) No.
DRAFT GREATER BUNBURY REGION SCHEME
I refer to the draft greater Bunbury region scheme. (1) At the time the latest draft was presented to Parliament recently, did the City of Bunbury indicate formally that it supports or opposes the inclusion of the Picton deviation road reserve? (2) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 directed Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? (3) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 agreed to any request or proposal by Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) The greater Bunbury region scheme as it is now before Parliament does not depict the possible Picton deviation. (2)-(3) No.
(1) At the time the latest draft was presented to Parliament recently, did the City of Bunbury indicate formally that it supports or opposes the inclusion of the Picton deviation road reserve? (2) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 directed Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? (3) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 agreed to any request or proposal by Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) The greater Bunbury region scheme as it is now before Parliament does not depict the possible Picton deviation. (2)-(3) No.
(2) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 directed Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? (3) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 agreed to any request or proposal by Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) The greater Bunbury region scheme as it is now before Parliament does not depict the possible Picton deviation. (2)-(3) No.
(3) Has any Labor minister since the election in 2001 agreed to any request or proposal by Main Roads or any planning authority to support the inclusion of the Picton deviation in the draft greater Bunbury region scheme; and, if so, when? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) The greater Bunbury region scheme as it is now before Parliament does not depict the possible Picton deviation. (2)-(3) No.
Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) The greater Bunbury region scheme as it is now before Parliament does not depict the possible Picton deviation. (2)-(3) No.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) The greater Bunbury region scheme as it is now before Parliament does not depict the possible Picton deviation. (2)-(3) No.
(1) The greater Bunbury region scheme as it is now before Parliament does not depict the possible Picton deviation. (2)-(3) No.
(2)-(3) No.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more