Hon. Kate Doust questions the government about the consideration and rejection of Latitude 32 as an alternative location for an intermodal terminal related to the Perth Freight Link project. The government states it was considered but deemed impractical and the cost was not assessed.

AnsweredQoN 712Legislative Council
Asked
18 June 2015
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

PERTH FREIGHT LINK
712. Hon KATE DOUST to the parliamentary
secretary representing the Minister for Transport:
I refer to the answer to question
without notice 675 of 16 June 2015.
(1) What specific
considerations were given to the alternative for a new intermodal terminal at
Latitude 32?
(2) Does the department intend to
implement the alternative?
(3) If no to (2), why not?
(4) What would be
the total cost to the state government to build the new intermodal terminal at
Latitude 32?

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the honourable member for
some notice of this question.
(1) The Perth
Freight Link business case considered the alternative for a new intermodal
terminal at Latitude 32 as part of a broader rail option.
(2) No.
(3) An intermodal
terminal at Latitude 32 is not a practical alternative to the Perth Freight
Link.
(4) The cost has
not been assessed.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more