❓ Hon Robin Chapple questions the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs regarding the delayed registration and mapping of Aboriginal heritage site 23323, specifically referencing previous inquiries and a recent Supreme Court decision impacting boundary determination. The Minister confirms the boundary is not yet captured due to the court decision.
AnsweredQoN 508Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
ABORIGINAL
HERITAGE ACT 1972 — HERITAGE SITES
508. Hon ROBIN CHAPPLE to the Minister
for Aboriginal Affairs:
I refer to other heritage place ID 23323, which
currently states, ''Cannot show a map of the site because the boundary
is yet to be captured''; the answer to part (n) of question on notice 187
of 6 August 2013 in which it was stated that the department had concluded its
work with cultural groups in refining the values and boundaries of site DIA
23323; and the answer to question without notice 396, asked in the Legislative
Council on 22April 2015.
(1) Has the boundary of site 23323 now been captured?
(2) If yes to (1), when will that be reflected on the other heritage
place ID 23323 register?
(3) If yes to (1), will site 23323 now appear on the register?
(4) If no to (3), what other impediments are
in the way of site 23323 appearing on the register as a registered site?
HERITAGE ACT 1972 — HERITAGE SITES
508. Hon ROBIN CHAPPLE to the Minister
for Aboriginal Affairs:
I refer to other heritage place ID 23323, which
currently states, ''Cannot show a map of the site because the boundary
is yet to be captured''; the answer to part (n) of question on notice 187
of 6 August 2013 in which it was stated that the department had concluded its
work with cultural groups in refining the values and boundaries of site DIA
23323; and the answer to question without notice 396, asked in the Legislative
Council on 22April 2015.
(1) Has the boundary of site 23323 now been captured?
(2) If yes to (1), when will that be reflected on the other heritage
place ID 23323 register?
(3) If yes to (1), will site 23323 now appear on the register?
(4) If no to (3), what other impediments are
in the way of site 23323 appearing on the register as a registered site?
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for
some notice of the question.
(1) No. The
boundary of the site requires reconsideration in light of the recent Supreme
Court decision by Justice Chaney.
(2)–(4) Not applicable.
some notice of the question.
(1) No. The
boundary of the site requires reconsideration in light of the recent Supreme
Court decision by Justice Chaney.
(2)–(4) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.