❓ This WA parliamentary question concerns appeals made under the Environmental Protection Act regarding the remediation of the Helena West Precinct. The answer details the outcomes of the appeals and the subsequent amendments to the Ministerial Conditions.
AnsweredQoN 1958Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) How many appeals under Section 46 of the
Environmental Protection Act
have been submitted in relation to the Remediation of the Helena West Precinct Statement No. 000640?
(2) What was the outcomes of those appeals?
(3) If all the appeals have been dismissed has it resulted in the Ministerial Conditions of this proposal being overridden?
(4) If so, under which authority were the Ministerial Conditions overridden?
Environmental Protection Act
have been submitted in relation to the Remediation of the Helena West Precinct Statement No. 000640?
(2) What was the outcomes of those appeals?
(3) If all the appeals have been dismissed has it resulted in the Ministerial Conditions of this proposal being overridden?
(4) If so, under which authority were the Ministerial Conditions overridden?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
1 June 2004
Responded by
Minister for Local Government and Regional Development representing the Minister for the Environment
Response time
28 days
(1) Two. (2) The appeal against the level of assessment was dismissed; the appeal against the Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA) Report and Recommendations was upheld in part. (3) The two appeals were not dismissed. The Ministerial Conditions recommended by the EPA were amended to require: · the Validation Report be reviewed and approved on advice of the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the final Coal Dam Remediation Plan is approved on advice from the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the Air Quality Management Plan is approved by the DoE’s Air Quality Management Branch · a complaints register be prepared and implemented · a Stakeholder Consultation Strategy be prepared and implemented. (4) The Ministerial Conditions were issued following determination of the appeals.
(2) The appeal against the level of assessment was dismissed; the appeal against the Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA) Report and Recommendations was upheld in part. (3) The two appeals were not dismissed. The Ministerial Conditions recommended by the EPA were amended to require: · the Validation Report be reviewed and approved on advice of the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the final Coal Dam Remediation Plan is approved on advice from the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the Air Quality Management Plan is approved by the DoE’s Air Quality Management Branch · a complaints register be prepared and implemented · a Stakeholder Consultation Strategy be prepared and implemented. (4) The Ministerial Conditions were issued following determination of the appeals.
(3) The two appeals were not dismissed. The Ministerial Conditions recommended by the EPA were amended to require: · the Validation Report be reviewed and approved on advice of the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the final Coal Dam Remediation Plan is approved on advice from the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the Air Quality Management Plan is approved by the DoE’s Air Quality Management Branch · a complaints register be prepared and implemented · a Stakeholder Consultation Strategy be prepared and implemented. (4) The Ministerial Conditions were issued following determination of the appeals.
(4) The Ministerial Conditions were issued following determination of the appeals.
(2) The appeal against the level of assessment was dismissed; the appeal against the Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA) Report and Recommendations was upheld in part. (3) The two appeals were not dismissed. The Ministerial Conditions recommended by the EPA were amended to require: · the Validation Report be reviewed and approved on advice of the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the final Coal Dam Remediation Plan is approved on advice from the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the Air Quality Management Plan is approved by the DoE’s Air Quality Management Branch · a complaints register be prepared and implemented · a Stakeholder Consultation Strategy be prepared and implemented. (4) The Ministerial Conditions were issued following determination of the appeals.
(3) The two appeals were not dismissed. The Ministerial Conditions recommended by the EPA were amended to require: · the Validation Report be reviewed and approved on advice of the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the final Coal Dam Remediation Plan is approved on advice from the DoE’s Land and Water Quality Branch · the Air Quality Management Plan is approved by the DoE’s Air Quality Management Branch · a complaints register be prepared and implemented · a Stakeholder Consultation Strategy be prepared and implemented. (4) The Ministerial Conditions were issued following determination of the appeals.
(4) The Ministerial Conditions were issued following determination of the appeals.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.