Hon Ken Travers questions the government's response to the Standing Committee on Environment and Public Affairs' report, specifically regarding cabinet approval and ministerial responsibility. The government's response is somewhat evasive, particularly regarding cabinet deliberations.

AnsweredQoN 630Legislative Council
Asked
12 September 2012
Portfolio
Leader of the House representing the Premier

QuestionView source ↗

STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC
AFFAIRS — TWENTY-SIXTH REPORT — GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
630. Hon KEN TRAVERS to the Leader of the House representing
the Premier:
I refer to tabled paper 4829.
(1) Can the
Leader of the House confirm that this document is the government's
response, in accordance with standing order 191, to the recommendations of the
Standing Committee on Environment and Public Affairs' twenty-sixth
report regarding petition 145?
(2) Did cabinet approve this response; and, if yes, on what
date?
(3) Are
government responses under standing order 191 required to be approved by
cabinet before they are tabled?
(4) If no to (3), how are government responses determined?
(5) Do all
ministers accept collective responsibility for government responses under
standing order 191 and are they bound by those responses in accordance with the
Westminster tradition?

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question.
(1) The report reflects a response from the Minister for
Transport.
(2) Cabinet deliberations are confidential, as the member
would well know.
(3) Responses are considered by cabinet when the responsible
minister deems this appropriate.
(4) See the response to (3).
(5) Where the
response to the report is considered by cabinet, all ministers are bound by the
Westminster tradition.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more