Dr. Thomas inquires about the Capel Shire's eligibility for mosquito control funding, application processes, and funding history. The response clarifies funding availability, application requirements, and emphasizes integrated mosquito management beyond larvicides.

AnsweredQoN 1967Legislative Assembly
Asked
20 March 2007
Portfolio
Health

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Is the Capel Shire entitled to annual funding under the Health Department’s mosquito control program for health driven disease management?
(2) If so, what level of funding is available?
(3) What is the application process required of the Shire?
(4) What activity will the funds cover?
(5) What concurrent funding is required by the Shire, and for what purposes?
(6) What funding has been delivered to Capel Shire for these purposes in each year from 2000 to 2006 inclusive?
(7) Has a proposal been received from Capel Shire for funding for 2007?
(8) Is mosquito control the only effective management tool for control of the viral diseases Ross River virus and Bamah Forest virus?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
8 May 2007
Responded by
Minister for Health
Response time
49 days
(2) Fifty percent funding for larvicides and 100 percent funding of helicopter hire for aerial larvicide applications. (3) A budget detailing proposed larvicide requirements is to be submitted to the Department of Health (DOH) by 31 July each year. The helicopter provider is paid directly by the DOH. (4) Mosquito larvicides, aerial application of larvicides, minor items of related equipment and topographical surveys. (5) Fifty percent funding of the larvicide budget and an additional 10 percent of the Shire larvicide budget to be placed in a Shire trust fund for contingencies. The Shire is also required to undertake the necessary surveys before and after aerial treatments. The Shire is also strongly encouraged to implement other appropriate components of an integrated mosquito management program. (6) 2006-07 was the first and only year the Shire requested that funding. Fifty percent of the larvicide budget, or $35,280, was contributed by the DOH. (7) Yes. A funding submission for larvicide was received for 2006-07 and the full request was funded. (8) No. Other important parts of an integrated mosquito management program include: · land-use planning that limits development in natural environments with a high risk of mosquito-borne disease; · personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
(3) A budget detailing proposed larvicide requirements is to be submitted to the Department of Health (DOH) by 31 July each year. The helicopter provider is paid directly by the DOH. (4) Mosquito larvicides, aerial application of larvicides, minor items of related equipment and topographical surveys. (5) Fifty percent funding of the larvicide budget and an additional 10 percent of the Shire larvicide budget to be placed in a Shire trust fund for contingencies. The Shire is also required to undertake the necessary surveys before and after aerial treatments. The Shire is also strongly encouraged to implement other appropriate components of an integrated mosquito management program. (6) 2006-07 was the first and only year the Shire requested that funding. Fifty percent of the larvicide budget, or $35,280, was contributed by the DOH. (7) Yes. A funding submission for larvicide was received for 2006-07 and the full request was funded. (8) No. Other important parts of an integrated mosquito management program include: · land-use planning that limits development in natural environments with a high risk of mosquito-borne disease; · personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
(4) Mosquito larvicides, aerial application of larvicides, minor items of related equipment and topographical surveys. (5) Fifty percent funding of the larvicide budget and an additional 10 percent of the Shire larvicide budget to be placed in a Shire trust fund for contingencies. The Shire is also required to undertake the necessary surveys before and after aerial treatments. The Shire is also strongly encouraged to implement other appropriate components of an integrated mosquito management program. (6) 2006-07 was the first and only year the Shire requested that funding. Fifty percent of the larvicide budget, or $35,280, was contributed by the DOH. (7) Yes. A funding submission for larvicide was received for 2006-07 and the full request was funded. (8) No. Other important parts of an integrated mosquito management program include: · land-use planning that limits development in natural environments with a high risk of mosquito-borne disease; · personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
(5) Fifty percent funding of the larvicide budget and an additional 10 percent of the Shire larvicide budget to be placed in a Shire trust fund for contingencies. The Shire is also required to undertake the necessary surveys before and after aerial treatments. The Shire is also strongly encouraged to implement other appropriate components of an integrated mosquito management program. (6) 2006-07 was the first and only year the Shire requested that funding. Fifty percent of the larvicide budget, or $35,280, was contributed by the DOH. (7) Yes. A funding submission for larvicide was received for 2006-07 and the full request was funded. (8) No. Other important parts of an integrated mosquito management program include: · land-use planning that limits development in natural environments with a high risk of mosquito-borne disease; · personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
(6) 2006-07 was the first and only year the Shire requested that funding. Fifty percent of the larvicide budget, or $35,280, was contributed by the DOH. (7) Yes. A funding submission for larvicide was received for 2006-07 and the full request was funded. (8) No. Other important parts of an integrated mosquito management program include: · land-use planning that limits development in natural environments with a high risk of mosquito-borne disease; · personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
(7) Yes. A funding submission for larvicide was received for 2006-07 and the full request was funded. (8) No. Other important parts of an integrated mosquito management program include: · land-use planning that limits development in natural environments with a high risk of mosquito-borne disease; · personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
(8) No. Other important parts of an integrated mosquito management program include: · land-use planning that limits development in natural environments with a high risk of mosquito-borne disease; · personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
· land-use planning that limits development in natural environments with a high risk of mosquito-borne disease; · personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
· personal protection and education; · habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
· habitat modification (where environmentally acceptable) to limit mosquito breeding; and · water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.
· water and engineering management practices that do not create or exacerbate mosquito-breeding.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more