Sue Ellery asks about the Department of Housing's maintenance contract with Transfield Services, specifically regarding invoices, payments, and work orders. Norman Moore provides figures for payments and completed work orders, noting the system's limitations in tracking submitted orders.

AnsweredQoN 663Legislative Council
Asked
15 September 2010
Portfolio
Housing

QuestionView source ↗

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING — MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
I refer to the Department of Housing’s new maintenance contract with Transfield Services. (1) Has Transfield submitted any invoices since 1 July 2010; and, if yes, how many? (2) What is the total value of payments made to Transfield? (3) How many work orders does this represent? Hon NORMAN MOORE

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. Please note that the department’s current system does not record the number of job orders submitted, only those paid once acquitted. (1) Yes, work—job—orders have been submitted. For the number paid, see (3). (2) The total value is $1 767 174.97. (3) This represents 9 258 work orders.
(1) Has Transfield submitted any invoices since 1 July 2010; and, if yes, how many? (2) What is the total value of payments made to Transfield? (3) How many work orders does this represent? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Please note that the department’s current system does not record the number of job orders submitted, only those paid once acquitted. (1) Yes, work—job—orders have been submitted. For the number paid, see (3). (2) The total value is $1 767 174.97. (3) This represents 9 258 work orders.
(2) What is the total value of payments made to Transfield? (3) How many work orders does this represent? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Please note that the department’s current system does not record the number of job orders submitted, only those paid once acquitted. (1) Yes, work—job—orders have been submitted. For the number paid, see (3). (2) The total value is $1 767 174.97. (3) This represents 9 258 work orders.
(3) How many work orders does this represent? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Please note that the department’s current system does not record the number of job orders submitted, only those paid once acquitted. (1) Yes, work—job—orders have been submitted. For the number paid, see (3). (2) The total value is $1 767 174.97. (3) This represents 9 258 work orders.
Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. Please note that the department’s current system does not record the number of job orders submitted, only those paid once acquitted. (1) Yes, work—job—orders have been submitted. For the number paid, see (3). (2) The total value is $1 767 174.97. (3) This represents 9 258 work orders.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. Please note that the department’s current system does not record the number of job orders submitted, only those paid once acquitted. (1) Yes, work—job—orders have been submitted. For the number paid, see (3). (2) The total value is $1 767 174.97. (3) This represents 9 258 work orders.
(1) Yes, work—job—orders have been submitted. For the number paid, see (3). (2) The total value is $1 767 174.97. (3) This represents 9 258 work orders.
(2) The total value is $1 767 174.97. (3) This represents 9 258 work orders.
(3) This represents 9 258 work orders.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more