Mr. Watson questions the application of the Buy Local Policy in contract HCNS 213606, specifically regarding preference for overseas manufacturers and freight cost disadvantages for regional WA suppliers. The Treasury and Finance response denies preference for overseas manufacturers and clarifies freight cost inclusion.

AnsweredQoN 2571Legislative Assembly
Asked
20 April 2010
Portfolio
Commerce

QuestionView source ↗

In regard to contract HCNS 213606 for the supply of Patient Aids and Appliances to Western Australian Public Health Care Units and the application of the Government’s Buy Local Policy, I ask:
(a) why does an overseas manufacturer of the products who distributes them in Perth have preference to a Western Australian company with a regional distributor;
(b) why does the freight clause included in the policy have no detriment to Perth-based suppliers who can tender freight free while regional suppliers must include the cost of freight in the tender; and
(c) why is there no recognition and support for regional suppliers specified in contract negotiations so that they can compete on the same freight terms as Perth-based suppliers?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
18 May 2010
Responded by
Minister for Commerce
Response time
28 days
Department of Treasury and Finance
(a) There is no preference for an overseas manufacturer.
(b) In cases such as HCNS 213606, the cost of freight is still included in the "free to store" tendered price - it is just not identified separately.
(c) See (b)
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more