❓ Mark McGowan (then in opposition) questions the Minister for Housing on the performance of regional contracts based on KPIs for routine, major, vacant property works, invoicing timeliness, and emergency work, receiving a detailed breakdown of compliance percentages across various regions.
AnsweredQoN 6321Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Minister’s answer to Question on Notice 4782 and ask:
(a) As at 30 September 2011, what are the KPI measurements for compliance for each of the individual regional contracts in terms of:
(i) routine work;
(ii) major works;
(iii) vacants;
(iv) timeliness of invoicing; and
(v) emergency work?
(a) As at 30 September 2011, what are the KPI measurements for compliance for each of the individual regional contracts in terms of:
(i) routine work;
(ii) major works;
(iii) vacants;
(iv) timeliness of invoicing; and
(v) emergency work?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
21 February 2012
Responded by
Minister for Housing
Response time
125 days
The
Department of Housing
advises:
(i) Goldfields 64 per cent
Kimberley 68 per cent
Metro South 65 per cent
Metro North 73 per cent
Metro SE 58 per cent
Mid West 71 per cent
Pilbara 79 per cent
Southern 64 per cent
South West 72 per cent
Wheat Belt 62 per cent
(ii) Goldfields 92 per cent
Kimberley 67 per cent
Metro South 81 per cent
Metro North 69 per cent
Metro SE 78 per cent
Mid West59 per cent
Pilbara 100 per cent
Southern 50 per cent
South West 70 per cent
Wheat Belt 38 per cent
(iii) Goldfields
Routine 79 per cent
Major Works 71 per cent
Kimberley
70 per cent
56 per cent
Metro South
74 per cent
100 per cent
Metro North
73 per cent
43 per cent
Metro SE
48 per cent
75 per cent
Mid West
81 per cent
No jobs
Pilbara
75 per cent
No jobs
Southern
69 per cent
100 per cent
South West
86 per cent
50 per cent
Wheat Belt
79 per cent
100 per cent
(iv) Goldfields 53 per cent
Kimberley 44 per cent
Metro South 86 per cent
Metro North 93 per cent
Metro SE 87 per cent
Mid West 83 per cent
Pilbara69 per cent
Southern 87 per cent
South West 80 per cent
Wheat Belt47 per cent
(v) Goldfields 41 per cent
Kimberley 54 per cent
Metro South 34 per cent
Metro North 57 per cent
Metro SE 27 per cent
Mid West 49 per cent
Pilbara 53 per cent
Southern 63 per cent
South West 62 per cent
Wheat Belt 48 per cent
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Department of Housing
advises:
(i) Goldfields 64 per cent
Kimberley 68 per cent
Metro South 65 per cent
Metro North 73 per cent
Metro SE 58 per cent
Mid West 71 per cent
Pilbara 79 per cent
Southern 64 per cent
South West 72 per cent
Wheat Belt 62 per cent
(ii) Goldfields 92 per cent
Kimberley 67 per cent
Metro South 81 per cent
Metro North 69 per cent
Metro SE 78 per cent
Mid West59 per cent
Pilbara 100 per cent
Southern 50 per cent
South West 70 per cent
Wheat Belt 38 per cent
(iii) Goldfields
Routine 79 per cent
Major Works 71 per cent
Kimberley
70 per cent
56 per cent
Metro South
74 per cent
100 per cent
Metro North
73 per cent
43 per cent
Metro SE
48 per cent
75 per cent
Mid West
81 per cent
No jobs
Pilbara
75 per cent
No jobs
Southern
69 per cent
100 per cent
South West
86 per cent
50 per cent
Wheat Belt
79 per cent
100 per cent
(iv) Goldfields 53 per cent
Kimberley 44 per cent
Metro South 86 per cent
Metro North 93 per cent
Metro SE 87 per cent
Mid West 83 per cent
Pilbara69 per cent
Southern 87 per cent
South West 80 per cent
Wheat Belt47 per cent
(v) Goldfields 41 per cent
Kimberley 54 per cent
Metro South 34 per cent
Metro North 57 per cent
Metro SE 27 per cent
Mid West 49 per cent
Pilbara 53 per cent
Southern 63 per cent
South West 62 per cent
Wheat Belt 48 per cent
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.