❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks detailed data on Equal Opportunity Commission inquiries, complaints, conciliations, and compensation awards, including comparisons with other Australian jurisdictions. The response provides some data but defers detailed information requests.
AnsweredQoN 119Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Can the minister provide a schedule setting out the inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission in each of the past seven years? (2) What was the nature and number of cases that proceeded to formal conciliation or were the subject of some other type of hearing and which resulted in a formal determination or award of compensation? (3) Of those cases, which ones were subject to an award for damages or compensation, what was the nature of the individual complaints and what was the respective quantum of the monetary award or other monetary determination resulting in compensation? (4) How does the quantum of those awards for compensation compare with awards for compensation for similar complaints or offences in other Australian jurisdictions? Will the minister provide a comparative analysis of these Australia-wide awards for compensation? (5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(2) What was the nature and number of cases that proceeded to formal conciliation or were the subject of some other type of hearing and which resulted in a formal determination or award of compensation? (3) Of those cases, which ones were subject to an award for damages or compensation, what was the nature of the individual complaints and what was the respective quantum of the monetary award or other monetary determination resulting in compensation? (4) How does the quantum of those awards for compensation compare with awards for compensation for similar complaints or offences in other Australian jurisdictions? Will the minister provide a comparative analysis of these Australia-wide awards for compensation? (5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(3) Of those cases, which ones were subject to an award for damages or compensation, what was the nature of the individual complaints and what was the respective quantum of the monetary award or other monetary determination resulting in compensation? (4) How does the quantum of those awards for compensation compare with awards for compensation for similar complaints or offences in other Australian jurisdictions? Will the minister provide a comparative analysis of these Australia-wide awards for compensation? (5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(4) How does the quantum of those awards for compensation compare with awards for compensation for similar complaints or offences in other Australian jurisdictions? Will the minister provide a comparative analysis of these Australia-wide awards for compensation? (5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
[See paper No 2034.]
(2) What was the nature and number of cases that proceeded to formal conciliation or were the subject of some other type of hearing and which resulted in a formal determination or award of compensation? (3) Of those cases, which ones were subject to an award for damages or compensation, what was the nature of the individual complaints and what was the respective quantum of the monetary award or other monetary determination resulting in compensation? (4) How does the quantum of those awards for compensation compare with awards for compensation for similar complaints or offences in other Australian jurisdictions? Will the minister provide a comparative analysis of these Australia-wide awards for compensation? (5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(3) Of those cases, which ones were subject to an award for damages or compensation, what was the nature of the individual complaints and what was the respective quantum of the monetary award or other monetary determination resulting in compensation? (4) How does the quantum of those awards for compensation compare with awards for compensation for similar complaints or offences in other Australian jurisdictions? Will the minister provide a comparative analysis of these Australia-wide awards for compensation? (5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(4) How does the quantum of those awards for compensation compare with awards for compensation for similar complaints or offences in other Australian jurisdictions? Will the minister provide a comparative analysis of these Australia-wide awards for compensation? (5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(5) Has any qualitative or quantitative research been conducted into the variation in quantum of damages across Australian jurisdictions for complaints of a similar nature; and, if so, will the minister advise of such studies or research? The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
The PRESIDENT: I trust that if the response is as extensive as the question, the Leader of the House will seek to table and incorporate it. Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
Hon KIM CHANCE replied : Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
Indeed, the response is reasonably concise. However, I will table supporting information to the question. On behalf of Hon Nick Griffiths, I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. (1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(1) Please find attached to this answer schedules detailing inquiries by ground and complaints by ground made to the Equal Opportunity Commission over the past seven years. (2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(2) Cases closed that proceeded to conciliation and achieved an outcome that included compensation - 2002-03 70 2001-02 73 2000-01 61 1999-2000 48 1998-99 52 1997-98 53 1996-97 47 (2) Cases that resulted in a formal determination of an award of compensation were heard in the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, a separate and distinct body from the Equal Opportunity Commission. (3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(3) If the member wishes to extract this information from tribunal decisions, he should place his question on notice so that it can be extracted from individual judgments of the tribunal. (4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(4) If the member places his request for comparative data from other jurisdictions on notice, the minister will request this information from other States and Territories. (5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
(5) The minister is not aware of any research comparing the quantum of damages awarded in equal opportunity jurisdictions in different States of Australia. [See paper No 2034.]
[See paper No 2034.]
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.