❓ A parliamentary question regarding the proposed amalgamation of East Greenwood and Allenswood Primary Schools and its potential impact on local bushland. The Minister indicates no environmental studies were conducted as no impact is anticipated, and existing bushland will be retained as much as possible.
AnsweredQoN 1024Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
EAST GREENWOOD AND ALLENSWOOD PRIMARY SCHOOLS - PROPOSED AMALGAMATION 1024. Hon RAY HALLIGAN to the minister representing the Minister for Education and Training: I refer to proposals to amalgamate the East Greenwood and Allenswood Primary Schools into a new school. (1) Have any environmental studies been carried out to ascertain the impact on any local bushland involved? (2) If so, with what results? (3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
EAST GREENWOOD AND ALLENSWOOD PRIMARY SCHOOLS - PROPOSED AMALGAMATION
I refer to proposals to amalgamate the East Greenwood and Allenswood Primary Schools into a new school. (1) Have any environmental studies been carried out to ascertain the impact on any local bushland involved? (2) If so, with what results? (3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(1) Have any environmental studies been carried out to ascertain the impact on any local bushland involved? (2) If so, with what results? (3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(2) If so, with what results? (3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
EAST GREENWOOD AND ALLENSWOOD PRIMARY SCHOOLS - PROPOSED AMALGAMATION
I refer to proposals to amalgamate the East Greenwood and Allenswood Primary Schools into a new school. (1) Have any environmental studies been carried out to ascertain the impact on any local bushland involved? (2) If so, with what results? (3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(1) Have any environmental studies been carried out to ascertain the impact on any local bushland involved? (2) If so, with what results? (3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(2) If so, with what results? (3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(3) If not, why not? (4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(4) Is it proposed to retain any of the existing bushland? (5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(5) If not, why not? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(2) Not applicable. (3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(3) It is not proposed to impact on the existing bushland with the construction of new school facilities. (4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(4) Yes, as much as possible around the new school. (5) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.