❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice seeks detailed information on the government's environmental enforcement and prosecution policy, including staffing, funding, types of breaches, enforcement actions, appeals, and public feedback on a policy review. The answer provided is incomplete, repeating sections of the question.
AnsweredQoN 823Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
With regard to the Government’s Enforcement and Prosecution Policy originally implemented in 2001 and modified in 2004, that covers all legislation administered by the Department of Environment and the Swan River Trust, could the Minister please provide -
(1) How many staff and what funding allocation has been provided to operate the Government’s Enforcement and Prosecution Policy from 2001 to date on an annual basis?
(2) What types of environmental breaches, including details of the classification, location, scope and seriousness, have occurred for the period 2001 to date?
(3) Under the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy from 2001 to date on an annual basis -
(a) how many Infringement Notices have been issued;
(b) how many Modified Penalty Notices have been issued;
(c) how many Statutory Notices and Directions have been issued;
(d) how many Environmental Field Notices have been issued;
(e) how many Written Warnings have been issued;
(f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued;
(g) how many physical interventions have occurred;
(h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and
(i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(4) How many of the above enforcement actions on an annual basis have been -
(a) challenged; or
(b) are still under appeal?
(5) The Environmental Enforcement Policy review closed on 3 March 2006. How many responses did your office receive from -
(a) individuals;
(b) corporations; and
(c) Government bodies?
(6) When will the full review results be made available to the public?
(1) How many staff and what funding allocation has been provided to operate the Government’s Enforcement and Prosecution Policy from 2001 to date on an annual basis?
(2) What types of environmental breaches, including details of the classification, location, scope and seriousness, have occurred for the period 2001 to date?
(3) Under the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy from 2001 to date on an annual basis -
(a) how many Infringement Notices have been issued;
(b) how many Modified Penalty Notices have been issued;
(c) how many Statutory Notices and Directions have been issued;
(d) how many Environmental Field Notices have been issued;
(e) how many Written Warnings have been issued;
(f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued;
(g) how many physical interventions have occurred;
(h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and
(i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(4) How many of the above enforcement actions on an annual basis have been -
(a) challenged; or
(b) are still under appeal?
(5) The Environmental Enforcement Policy review closed on 3 March 2006. How many responses did your office receive from -
(a) individuals;
(b) corporations; and
(c) Government bodies?
(6) When will the full review results be made available to the public?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
2 May 2006
Responded by
Minister for the Environment
Response time
27 days
(b) how many Modified Penalty Notices have been issued; (c) how many Statutory Notices and Directions have been issued; (d) how many Environmental Field Notices have been issued; (e) how many Written Warnings have been issued; (f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(c) how many Statutory Notices and Directions have been issued; (d) how many Environmental Field Notices have been issued; (e) how many Written Warnings have been issued; (f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(d) how many Environmental Field Notices have been issued; (e) how many Written Warnings have been issued; (f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(e) how many Written Warnings have been issued; (f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(b) are still under appeal?
(b) corporations; and (c) Government bodies?
(c) Government bodies?
· 2003/2004 $811,795 (includes salary for 10 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit). · 2004/2005 $811,795 (includes salary for 10 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit). · 2005/2006 $941,685 (includes salary for 10.9 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit and an amount of $60,000 to fund a short term contact of 0.45 FTE and operational costs to investigate illegal dumping). (2) Since 2001 the Department of Environment (DoE) has investigated a variety of braches under the legislation administered by the DoE, the Water and Rivers Commission and the Swan River Trust. The breaches can be summarised under the following categories: · Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· 2004/2005 $811,795 (includes salary for 10 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit). · 2005/2006 $941,685 (includes salary for 10.9 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit and an amount of $60,000 to fund a short term contact of 0.45 FTE and operational costs to investigate illegal dumping). (2) Since 2001 the Department of Environment (DoE) has investigated a variety of braches under the legislation administered by the DoE, the Water and Rivers Commission and the Swan River Trust. The breaches can be summarised under the following categories: · Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· 2005/2006 $941,685 (includes salary for 10.9 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit and an amount of $60,000 to fund a short term contact of 0.45 FTE and operational costs to investigate illegal dumping). (2) Since 2001 the Department of Environment (DoE) has investigated a variety of braches under the legislation administered by the DoE, the Water and Rivers Commission and the Swan River Trust. The breaches can be summarised under the following categories: · Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(2) Since 2001 the Department of Environment (DoE) has investigated a variety of braches under the legislation administered by the DoE, the Water and Rivers Commission and the Swan River Trust. The breaches can be summarised under the following categories: · Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(c) how many Statutory Notices and Directions have been issued; (d) how many Environmental Field Notices have been issued; (e) how many Written Warnings have been issued; (f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(d) how many Environmental Field Notices have been issued; (e) how many Written Warnings have been issued; (f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(e) how many Written Warnings have been issued; (f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(f) how many Amendment to Licence Conditions/Permits have been issued; (g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(g) how many physical interventions have occurred; (h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(h) how many Suspension or Revocation of Works Approval or Licence/Permit have been issued; and (i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(i) what other types of enforcements or prosecutions have been issued and if so, for what breaches?
(b) are still under appeal?
(b) corporations; and (c) Government bodies?
(c) Government bodies?
· 2003/2004 $811,795 (includes salary for 10 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit). · 2004/2005 $811,795 (includes salary for 10 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit). · 2005/2006 $941,685 (includes salary for 10.9 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit and an amount of $60,000 to fund a short term contact of 0.45 FTE and operational costs to investigate illegal dumping). (2) Since 2001 the Department of Environment (DoE) has investigated a variety of braches under the legislation administered by the DoE, the Water and Rivers Commission and the Swan River Trust. The breaches can be summarised under the following categories: · Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· 2004/2005 $811,795 (includes salary for 10 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit). · 2005/2006 $941,685 (includes salary for 10.9 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit and an amount of $60,000 to fund a short term contact of 0.45 FTE and operational costs to investigate illegal dumping). (2) Since 2001 the Department of Environment (DoE) has investigated a variety of braches under the legislation administered by the DoE, the Water and Rivers Commission and the Swan River Trust. The breaches can be summarised under the following categories: · Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· 2005/2006 $941,685 (includes salary for 10.9 FTE staff and operational expenses for the Unit and an amount of $60,000 to fund a short term contact of 0.45 FTE and operational costs to investigate illegal dumping). (2) Since 2001 the Department of Environment (DoE) has investigated a variety of braches under the legislation administered by the DoE, the Water and Rivers Commission and the Swan River Trust. The breaches can be summarised under the following categories: · Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(2) Since 2001 the Department of Environment (DoE) has investigated a variety of braches under the legislation administered by the DoE, the Water and Rivers Commission and the Swan River Trust. The breaches can be summarised under the following categories: · Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Bore(Groundwater); Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Dirty/Smelly Water Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Excessive Watering/Wasting Water No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
No water available Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Other Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Unauthorised use Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Water during restricted hours. · Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Clearing of Native Vegetation; Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Burning Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Cutting Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Draining Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Flooding Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Grazing Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Poisoning · Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Compliance Activity; · Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Environmental Protection Act Licence Exceedance; Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Discharges to land (quality) Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Discharges to land (quantity) Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Discharges to water (quality) Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Emissions to air (quality) Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Emissions to air (quantity) · Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Pollution; Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Air quality Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Controlled Waste Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Dust Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Hazardous material Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Liquid Waste Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Noise Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Odour Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Pesticide Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Smoke Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Solid Waste Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Unauthorised Discharge · Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Rights in Water and Irrigation Act Licence Exceedance; Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Ground Water Abstraction Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Other Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Surface Water Abstraction · Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Rivers and Waterways Management; and Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Algal blooms Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Aquatic deaths Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Chemical spills Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Destruction of Vegetation Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Foaming Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Foreshore damage General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
General complaints Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Herbicide/pesticide spraying Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Industrial Discharge/dewatering Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Offensive odour Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Oil slicks/Fuel spills River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
River discolouration Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Sewage discharge Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Unauthorised development Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Waste/rubbish dump Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Watercraft nuisance Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Weed · Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
· Surface Water. Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Dams/obstruction/interference Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Dirty/smelly water Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Not during 6pm to 9am Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Other Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Over pumping/waste water Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Unauthorised use Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Water flow issues. The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
The scope and seriousness of these breaches ranges from minor or trivial through to more serious ie. Pollution. (3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(a) The responses to this question (Question 3) are based primarily on the data contained in the DoE's Incident Complaints Management System which was introduced in early 2004 to record environmental incidents and complaints. 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 Not available 2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 10 2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 12 2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 4 up until April 2006 (3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(b) 2001 None 2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 1 2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 None 2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 None 2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 2 2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 2 (3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(c) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 Not available 2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 1 2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 3 2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 None up until April 2006 (3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(d) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 14 (after July 2003) 2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 99 2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 141 2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 38 up until April 2006 (3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(e) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 25 (after July 03) 2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 76 2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 60 2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 5 up until April 2006 (3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(f) 2001 Not available 2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Not available 2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 6 (After July 2003) 2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 22 2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 20 2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 1 up until April 2006 (3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(g) The DoE has not located any record of any physical interventions as described in the Enforcement and Prosecution Policy 2004 occurring since 2001. (3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(h) The DoE has not located any record of the revoking or suspending any licences, permits or works approvals since 2001. (3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(3)(i) Prosecutions 2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2001 Prosecution for breach of emission standards for sulphur dioxide in Kalgoorlie Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 51 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2002 Prosecution for breach of sections 56 and 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 118 Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 58 Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2003 Prosecution breach of regulation 50(1) Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste ) Regulations 2001. Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of sections 49(3) and 99Q(1) Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 49(3) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2004 Prosecution for breach of Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 26B(3)(b) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 12B(1) and (2) Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947. Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 49(5)(a) Environmental Protection Act 1986. 2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2005 3 x Prosecutions for Regulation 3(1) Environmental Protection (Unauthorised Discharges) Regulations 2004. Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 58(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecutions for breach of section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecutions for breach of regulation 6 and 9 Environmental Protection (Abrasive Blasting) Regulations 1998. 2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
2006 2 x Prosecutions for breach of section 5(c)(1)(a) Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Prosecution for breach of section 51(c) Environmental Protection Act 1986. (4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(4)(a) Four Defendants' have pleaded 'not guilty' since 2001. Three were subsequently found guilty and the fourth is subject to a decision in February 2006 in the Perth Magistrates Court, which has yet to be handed down. (b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(b) There are currently no cases under appeal before the Courts however there is one matter in which the decision has been reserved by the Magistrate in which the defendant pleaded not guilty. (5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(5)(a) 3 individuals (b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(b) 4 corporations (or staff from corporations) (c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(c) 10 government bodies (or public servants within government bodies) (6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
(6) The analysis of the feedback received from the review is currently assisting in the development of a new draft policy. It is envisaged that the draft policy will be distributed and additional feedback sought in June 2006.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.