❓ A parliamentary question regarding the impact of South Coast shark fishery closures around sealion breeding areas, focusing on travel, compensation, licence leasing, and licence withdrawals. The answer clarifies the Commonwealth's role and State's position.
AnsweredQoN 270Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the closure of South Coast shark fisheries around sealion breeding areas, and I ask: (a) what additional travel have South Coast shark fishers been forced to undertake to maintain their businesses; (b) what compensation has been paid to impacted fishers; (c) are impacted fishers able to lease their licences to other people; (d) were any licences withdrawn or voluntarily surrendered as a part of the process; and (e) if yes to (d), how many and what compensation was paid?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
12 October 2021
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Fisheries
Response time
10 days
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) requires the Commonwealth Government to assess the environmental performance of fisheries and any potential impacts on protected marine species. To satisfy an approval condition, Australian sea lion gillnet exclusion zones were introduced in 2018 around important breeding colonies in the West Coast and South Coast Bioregions. The zones were negotiated between the State and Commonwealth Governments based on the best available science.
(a) The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development will conduct a review in 2022 of effort changes in the Temperate Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery following implementation of the zones and the availability of sufficient time series data.
(b) As the requirements were introduced under the Commonwealth’s EPBC Act to reduce the impact of fishing activity on a listed threatened species, there is no compensation payable on the part of the State Government
(c) Yes. Licence holders in the Temperate Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fisheries have the ability to lease or sell their managed fishery licences or permits under current management arrangements.
(d) No.
(e) Not applicable.
(a) The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development will conduct a review in 2022 of effort changes in the Temperate Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery following implementation of the zones and the availability of sufficient time series data.
(b) As the requirements were introduced under the Commonwealth’s EPBC Act to reduce the impact of fishing activity on a listed threatened species, there is no compensation payable on the part of the State Government
(c) Yes. Licence holders in the Temperate Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fisheries have the ability to lease or sell their managed fishery licences or permits under current management arrangements.
(d) No.
(e) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.