Hon Robin Chapple questions the State Government regarding the proposed intermodal uranium transfer hub at Parkeston, focusing on proponent identification, government involvement, community consultation, and transportation arrangements. The government redirects the questions to the Ministers for Regional Development and Mines and Petroleum.

AnsweredQoN 4507Legislative Council
Asked
16 August 2011
Portfolio
State Development

QuestionView source ↗

In regards to an intermodal hub at Parkeston for the transfer of uranium from truck to rail, referred to in four uranium scoping documents submitted by Cameco, BHP Billiton, Mega Uranium and Toro Energy, and more recently in the ERMP for the Wiluna uranium mine by Toro Energy Pty Ltd, I ask -
(1) Who is the proponent for the facility at Parkeston?
(2) If there is no proponent, what is the State Government’s role in advancing the Parkeston facility?
(3) Is the State Government intending to seek expressions of interest or tenders for the development of the Parkeston facility?
(4) Is the State Government supportive of the establishment of the facility at Parkeston?
(5) What is the State Government’s preferred process for establishing a facility at Parkeston, and what is the next step in this process?
(6) What discussions have been had between the State Government and the Kalgoorlie Council about the Parkeston facility?
(7) What discussions have been had between the State Government and the Federal Government about the Parkeston Facility?
(8) Based on preliminary discussions, what corporation(s) or Government agencies would finance the project?
(9) Has the State Government or the Kalgoorlie Council had any preliminary consultation with the communities in the North East Suburbs of Kalgoorlie or the Ninga Mina Aboriginal Community about the facility?
(10) If no to (9), why not?
(11) Has the State Government, Department of Mines and Petroleum and/or the Radiological Council had discussions about arrangements for uranium shipments before a transfer station has been built?
(12) If yes to (11), what is the preferred route for trucking uranium?
(13) If no to (11), why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
20 September 2011
Responded by
Minister for State Development
Response time
35 days
Department of State Development advises:
(1-10) The Parkeston facility is a component of Regional Development and Lands Ports link program. The Honourable Member should address these questions to the Minister for Regional Development.
(11-13)The Honourable Member should address these questions to the Minister for Mines and Petroleum.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more