Question regarding inconsistencies in residential density calculations between different precincts within the Subiaco Redevelopment area, specifically comparing Station precinct and China Green precinct, and challenging a previous ministerial statement.

⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 6454Legislative Council
Asked
26 June 2008
Portfolio
Planning and Infrastructure

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Residential density is usually expressed with reference to the developable portion of the total area, excluding the area taken up by roads and public open space?
(2) The residential density of the Station precinct of Subiaco Centro in the Scheme text is R80 and based on the developable area of that precinct?
(3) The Subiaco Redevelopment Authority’s draft Scheme Amendment No. 4 for the China Green precinct specifies (at page five), a residential density of R120 based on the ‘total’ area of the precinct (at page four)?
(4) The Minister’s reply to question four is incorrect when she says that the residential density of the China Green precinct is ‘the same as the existing Station Square development’?
Answered on

AnswerView source ↗

This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more