Question regarding the Swan River Crossings project and the integration of a Principal Shared Path (PSP), specifically concerning design, constraints, and impact on businesses. The answer deflects, citing a prior briefing and expressing disappointment in the questioner's conduct.

AnsweredQoN 958Legislative Council
Asked
21 September 2022
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the Swan River Crossings project, and I ask: (a) has
an overpass for a future grade separated Principal Shared Path (PSP) crossing over Beach Street been
designed into current plans, even if it will not be constructed as part of this
project: (i) if no to (a), why not; (b) what
are the physical constraints on a PSP following the North/West side of Beach
Street adjacent to the rail reserve from the river to Fremantle station: (i) why can't these physical constraints be overcome; and (c) if
PSP is intended to go on the south/east side of Beach Street: (i) what
will be the impact on alfresco dining at The Sunshine Harvester Works; (ii) where
else on the PSP network do driveways cross PSPs; (iii) where the PSP crosses driveways, who will be required to give way; and (iv) how many times will cyclists need to give way to vehicles on this PSP alignment?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
20 October 2022
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Minister for Transport
Response time
6 days
(a)-(c)  I am advised that you were recently briefed on this project by the Project Director and the Minister for Transport’s office.
I understand your questions regarding the location of Principal Shared Paths were extensively answered during this briefing.
I am also advised that the Minister for Transport was disappointed to hear of your treatment of the Project Director during the briefing.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more