Ms Walker questions the Premier's justification for allowing Mr. Excell's deportation to the UK, given the Premier's focus on child wellbeing in WA. The Premier deflects, deferring to the Attorney General's previous statement that deportation was a condition of release.

AnsweredQoN 285Legislative Assembly
Asked
21 June 2005
Portfolio
Premier

QuestionView source ↗

I have a supplementary question. Given that the Premier has taken responsibility for introducing the Parental Support and Responsibility Bill, which he says is intended to protect and safeguard the wellbeing of the children of Western Australia, how does he justify allowing Excell to be unleashed on unsuspecting UK children? Dr G.I. GALLOP

AnswerView source ↗

These matters have been dealt with very appropriately by the Attorney General. I repeat the point he made: the condition of Mr Excell’s release from prison in Western Australia is his deportation to Great Britain.
Dr G.I. GALLOP replied: These matters have been dealt with very appropriately by the Attorney General. I repeat the point he made: the condition of Mr Excell’s release from prison in Western Australia is his deportation to Great Britain.
These matters have been dealt with very appropriately by the Attorney General. I repeat the point he made: the condition of Mr Excell’s release from prison in Western Australia is his deportation to Great Britain.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more