❓ This parliamentary question seeks data on the origin (metropolitan, non-metropolitan, Aboriginal descent) of obstetric and gynaecological patients in Western Australia. The Minister provides percentage breakdowns for each category.
AnsweredQoN 376Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) a gynaecological patients; were - (i) from non metropolitan centres in Western Australia; (ii) of aboriginal descent; and (iii) the metropolitan area?
were - (i) from non metropolitan centres in Western Australia; (ii) of aboriginal descent; and (iii) the metropolitan area?
(ii) of aboriginal descent; and (iii) the metropolitan area?
(iii) the metropolitan area?
were - (i) from non metropolitan centres in Western Australia; (ii) of aboriginal descent; and (iii) the metropolitan area?
(ii) of aboriginal descent; and (iii) the metropolitan area?
(iii) the metropolitan area?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
10 October 2000
Response time
62 days
The Minister Replied:
(a) Obstetric patients
(i) 11.9%
(ii) 8.5%
(iii) 87.9%
(b) Gynaecology patients
(i) 9.9%
(ii) 3.6%
(iii) 89.8%
(a) Obstetric patients
(i) 11.9%
(ii) 8.5%
(iii) 87.9%
(b) Gynaecology patients
(i) 9.9%
(ii) 3.6%
(iii) 89.8%
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.