❓ A parliamentary question was raised regarding potential breaches of license by Portman Mining at Jackson, specifically concerning incursions into exclusion zones. The response indicated that no breaches have been established.
AnsweredQoN 428Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
With regard to iron ore mining at Jackson by Portman Mining and its subcontractors, I ask - (1) Have there been any breaches of licence on incursions into the exclusion zone surrounding the mining area that affect the responsibilities of either the Department of Environmental Protection or the Department of Conservation and Land Management? (2) If yes to (1), how many and on what dates did these occur, and what was the nature of the breaches or incursions? (3) If yes to (1), where precisely did these occur? (4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(1) Have there been any breaches of licence on incursions into the exclusion zone surrounding the mining area that affect the responsibilities of either the Department of Environmental Protection or the Department of Conservation and Land Management? (2) If yes to (1), how many and on what dates did these occur, and what was the nature of the breaches or incursions? (3) If yes to (1), where precisely did these occur? (4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(2) If yes to (1), how many and on what dates did these occur, and what was the nature of the breaches or incursions? (3) If yes to (1), where precisely did these occur? (4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(3) If yes to (1), where precisely did these occur? (4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(2)-(4) Not applicable.
(1) Have there been any breaches of licence on incursions into the exclusion zone surrounding the mining area that affect the responsibilities of either the Department of Environmental Protection or the Department of Conservation and Land Management? (2) If yes to (1), how many and on what dates did these occur, and what was the nature of the breaches or incursions? (3) If yes to (1), where precisely did these occur? (4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(2) If yes to (1), how many and on what dates did these occur, and what was the nature of the breaches or incursions? (3) If yes to (1), where precisely did these occur? (4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(3) If yes to (1), where precisely did these occur? (4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(4) If yes to (1) and (2), what action in response was taken by either the DEP or CALM? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
I answer on behalf of Hon Tom Stephens. (1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(1) No breaches have been established in relation to either licences or ministerial conditions related to the restricted areas associated with the mining areas at the site. (2)-(4) Not applicable.
(2)-(4) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.