❓ A WA parliamentary question scrutinising the appointment and benefits received by Mr. Lawrence, an Assistant Superintendent, focusing on his qualifications, the necessity of his position, and previous adverse findings from a Royal Commission.
AnsweredQoN 522Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) an availability allowance?
(b) an availability allowance to be paid?
(4) Does he still have the use of that vehicle? (5) If not, why not? (6) Does Mr Lawrence occupy the position of Assistant Superintendent (Business and Industry) at the C.W. Campbell Remand Centre / Canning Vale Prison? (7) Prior to Mr Lawrence occupying this position, who occupied it? (8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister
(b) an availability allowance to be paid?
(4) Does he still have the use of that vehicle? (5) If not, why not? (6) Does Mr Lawrence occupy the position of Assistant Superintendent (Business and Industry) at the C.W. Campbell Remand Centre / Canning Vale Prison? (7) Prior to Mr Lawrence occupying this position, who occupied it? (8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
10 October 2000
Response time
55 days
(1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(5) If not, why not? (6) Does Mr Lawrence occupy the position of Assistant Superintendent (Business and Industry) at the C.W. Campbell Remand Centre / Canning Vale Prison? (7) Prior to Mr Lawrence occupying this position, who occupied it? (8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(6) Does Mr Lawrence occupy the position of Assistant Superintendent (Business and Industry) at the C.W. Campbell Remand Centre / Canning Vale Prison? (7) Prior to Mr Lawrence occupying this position, who occupied it? (8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(7) Prior to Mr Lawrence occupying this position, who occupied it? (8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(5) If not, why not? (6) Does Mr Lawrence occupy the position of Assistant Superintendent (Business and Industry) at the C.W. Campbell Remand Centre / Canning Vale Prison? (7) Prior to Mr Lawrence occupying this position, who occupied it? (8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(6) Does Mr Lawrence occupy the position of Assistant Superintendent (Business and Industry) at the C.W. Campbell Remand Centre / Canning Vale Prison? (7) Prior to Mr Lawrence occupying this position, who occupied it? (8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(7) Prior to Mr Lawrence occupying this position, who occupied it? (8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(8) Is it a new position? (9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(9) For what reason was it created? (10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(10) Why is the position needed? (11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(11) What experience does a person need to occupy the position? (12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(12) What experience does Mr Lawrence have to occupy this position? (13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(13) Has the Government rejected the finding made by the Royal Commission into the City of Wanneroo which found at its interim 1996 report quote I consider the conduct of both Mr Lawrence and Mr Grant to have been disgraceful . (14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(14) Does this appointment indicate the Government has found no substance in the Royal Commission findings? (15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
(15) If not, why not? Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
Answered on 10 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) (a) Yes (b) Yes (2) (a) Mr Lawrence has a substantive level 8 classification. (b) The Superintendent has determined that the nature of the work requires the incumbent to be on call. (3) Yes (4) No (5) When the private plated vehicle was due for replacement Mr Lawrence elected to withdraw from the Executive Vehicle Scheme. (6) That is his substantive position, however as previously advised Mr Lawrence has, since November 1998 been heading the project team involved in the redevelopment of the Hakea site. (7) It was a new position. (8) Yes,(see 7). (9) To manage all activities related to prisoner programmes and development and to manage resource use within the remand centre. (10) To manage the business and industry program at the site. (11) Broad based prison experience, including line management at operational and administrative levels. (12) See 11. (13) There were no adverse findings made against Mr Lawrence in the Royal Commission's final report. Both the Public Sector Standards Commission and an independent legal practitioner scrutinised the evidence and confirmed that there was neither criminal nor administrative impropriety on Mr Lawrence's part. (14) See (13) above. (15) See (13) above.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.