❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding the deletion of the Fremantle Eastern Bypass (FEB) from the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS). It seeks data on public submissions, petitions, and community action group involvement related to the decision.
AnsweredQoN 712Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Minister’s decision to delete the Fremantle Eastern Bypass (FEB) from the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS), and the public submissions received by the initial closing date of March 12 2003 -
(1) How many individual submissions were received by the WAPC by March 12 2003?
(2) Of these how many -
(a) were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS;
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS; and
(c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(3) Have any community action groups sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS, and what number of people do they claim to represent?
(4) How many petitions were received by the WAPC by March 12 2003, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions?
(5) Of these petitions how many -
(a) were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent; and
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent?
(1) How many individual submissions were received by the WAPC by March 12 2003?
(2) Of these how many -
(a) were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS;
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS; and
(c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(3) Have any community action groups sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS, and what number of people do they claim to represent?
(4) How many petitions were received by the WAPC by March 12 2003, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions?
(5) Of these petitions how many -
(a) were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent; and
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
12 June 2003
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
37 days
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS; and (c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent?
1 - 2. 4628 individual submissions were received by the initial closing date of 12 March 2003. 2 a) 414 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; 2 b) 4166 opposed deleting the FEB; and 2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
1 - 2. 4628 individual submissions were received by the initial closing date of 12 March 2003. 2 a) 414 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; 2 b) 4166 opposed deleting the FEB; and 2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
2 a) 414 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; 2 b) 4166 opposed deleting the FEB; and 2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
2 b) 4166 opposed deleting the FEB; and 2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
(c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent?
1 - 2. 4628 individual submissions were received by the initial closing date of 12 March 2003. 2 a) 414 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; 2 b) 4166 opposed deleting the FEB; and 2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
1 - 2. 4628 individual submissions were received by the initial closing date of 12 March 2003. 2 a) 414 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; 2 b) 4166 opposed deleting the FEB; and 2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
2 a) 414 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; 2 b) 4166 opposed deleting the FEB; and 2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
2 b) 4166 opposed deleting the FEB; and 2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
2 c) 595 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
3. By 12 March 2003 a total of 4 action groups* had sought hearings, representing 130 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
4. Three petitions were received by 12 March 2003. They contained a total of 87 signatures. 5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(a) One 7 signature petition supported the deletion of the FEB. 5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(b) Two petitions, containing a total of 80 signatures, opposed the deletion of the FEB. No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.