❓ A parliamentary question addresses the zoning, land use, acquisition, compensation, and capacity of a proposed wastewater treatment plant at Alkimos, Western Australia. The Minister provides answers regarding land ownership, zoning, potential buffer area uses, acquisition plans, compensation, and plant capacity.
AnsweredQoN 516Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the waste water treatment plant proposed to be constructed at Alkimos. (1) What is the current zoning of the land surrounding the proposed location of the water treatment plant? (2) What land uses are proposed for the buffer area? (3) Does the Water Corporation intend to resume or acquire the land in the buffer area? (4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(1) What is the current zoning of the land surrounding the proposed location of the water treatment plant? (2) What land uses are proposed for the buffer area? (3) Does the Water Corporation intend to resume or acquire the land in the buffer area? (4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(2) What land uses are proposed for the buffer area? (3) Does the Water Corporation intend to resume or acquire the land in the buffer area? (4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(3) Does the Water Corporation intend to resume or acquire the land in the buffer area? (4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(1) What is the current zoning of the land surrounding the proposed location of the water treatment plant? (2) What land uses are proposed for the buffer area? (3) Does the Water Corporation intend to resume or acquire the land in the buffer area? (4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(2) What land uses are proposed for the buffer area? (3) Does the Water Corporation intend to resume or acquire the land in the buffer area? (4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(3) Does the Water Corporation intend to resume or acquire the land in the buffer area? (4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(4) Is compensation payable to owners of land deleteriously affected by a Water Corporation buffer area; and, if not, why not? (5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(5) What is the proposed design capacity on the maximum volume of waste water that can be potentially processed and discharged from the plant into an ocean outfall? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Mr President - The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
The PRESIDENT : Order! Is the answer somewhat lengthy? Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Hon KIM CHANCE : It is not, Mr President. The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
The PRESIDENT : We have not dealt with many questions so far in this question time. Therefore, if the opportunity arises, I am sure the house will appreciate it if ministers and parliamentary secretaries table answers. Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Hon KIM CHANCE : I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of his very timely question. (1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(1) The corporation owns lot 101, which largely caters for what is known as site A, and is currently zoned “public purposes”. The advertised metropolitan region scheme amendment caters for what is known as site B. It is 750 metres to the east of site A and the amendment has site B designated “public purposes”. (2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(2) The Water Corporation has investigated some conceptual uses that could include, but are not limited to, the following: conservation, marine research centre, aquaculture, sports field, golf course, aquatic recreation or passive recreation such as walk trails. (3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(3) Yes. (4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(4) No, the Water Corporation intends to procure a buffer area of sufficient size to ensure that no private land is deleteriously affected. (5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
(5) The proposed design capacity of the waste water treatment plant is 160 megalitres a day.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.