❓ Hon. Barbara Scott asks about the valuation of land proposed for excision from Wireless Hill A-class reserve. Hon. Ken Travers confirms a valuation was undertaken in May 2002 by the Valuer General's Office on behalf of LandCorp, placing the value between $1.79 million and $1.97 million.
AnsweredQoN 1200Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
With regard to the proposed excision from Wireless Hill A-class reserve, I ask - (1) Will the minister inform the Parliament whether a valuation has been sought on behalf of the State Government or the City of Melville within the past five years for the land or any part of the land proposed for excision from the Wireless Hill A-class reserve? (2) If yes, what type of valuation has been carried out? (3) If so, when was the valuation carried out? (4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(1) Will the minister inform the Parliament whether a valuation has been sought on behalf of the State Government or the City of Melville within the past five years for the land or any part of the land proposed for excision from the Wireless Hill A-class reserve? (2) If yes, what type of valuation has been carried out? (3) If so, when was the valuation carried out? (4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(2) If yes, what type of valuation has been carried out? (3) If so, when was the valuation carried out? (4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(3) If so, when was the valuation carried out? (4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(1) Will the minister inform the Parliament whether a valuation has been sought on behalf of the State Government or the City of Melville within the past five years for the land or any part of the land proposed for excision from the Wireless Hill A-class reserve? (2) If yes, what type of valuation has been carried out? (3) If so, when was the valuation carried out? (4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(2) If yes, what type of valuation has been carried out? (3) If so, when was the valuation carried out? (4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(3) If so, when was the valuation carried out? (4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(4) At what price has the land or any part of the land proposed for excision been valued? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. (1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(1) Yes. (2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(2) A current market valuation was undertaken by the Valuer General’s Office on behalf of LandCorp. (3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(3) May 2002. (4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
(4) Between $1.79 million and $1.97 million, including the value of improvements dependent on the road access arrangements.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.