❓ Hon Giz Watson questions the Minister for Mines regarding the classification of a 1994 hearing concerning four jointly listed applications, specifically whether it was one hearing or two separate cases. The Minister confirms it was one hearing and refers to a previous statement for explanation.
AnsweredQoN 880Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Is the statement I (and the Department of Minerals and Energy) consider that the hearing of these four jointly listed applications on September 20 1994 was in fact one hearing, not two separate cases or hearings as you claim correct? (2) If not, why not? (3) Can the Minister explain why he considers that there was in fact one hearing and not two separate cases or hearings? (4) If not, why not? Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
11 October 2000
Response time
20 days
(1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
(2) If not, why not? (3) Can the Minister explain why he considers that there was in fact one hearing and not two separate cases or hearings? (4) If not, why not? Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
(3) Can the Minister explain why he considers that there was in fact one hearing and not two separate cases or hearings? (4) If not, why not? Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
(4) If not, why not? Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
(2) If not, why not? (3) Can the Minister explain why he considers that there was in fact one hearing and not two separate cases or hearings? (4) If not, why not? Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
(3) Can the Minister explain why he considers that there was in fact one hearing and not two separate cases or hearings? (4) If not, why not? Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
(4) If not, why not? Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
Answered on 11 October 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) & (2) Yes. (3) & (4) Please refer to my statement in the Legislative Council on 8 December 1999, pages 3996 and 3997 of Hansard.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.