❓ Mr. Paolino questions the impact of the Cook Labor government's housing supply measures. The Minister responds by highlighting increased building approvals and completions, criticising the opposition's stance on density and housing affordability.
AnsweredQoN 52Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
Housing—Supply
52. Mr Frank Paolino to the Minister for Housing and Works:
I refer to the various measures the Cook Labor government
has implemented to prioritise housing supply.
(1)
Can the minister outline to the house how this prioritisation is impacting
housing availability and delivery in Western Australia?
(2)
Can the minister advise the house whether he is aware of any alternative priorities
to boosting housing in our state?
52. Mr Frank Paolino to the Minister for Housing and Works:
I refer to the various measures the Cook Labor government
has implemented to prioritise housing supply.
(1)
Can the minister outline to the house how this prioritisation is impacting
housing availability and delivery in Western Australia?
(2)
Can the minister advise the house whether he is aware of any alternative priorities
to boosting housing in our state?
AnswerView source ↗
(1)–(2)
I want to thank the member for his question. As members know, we take the issue
of housing supply very seriously and we have undertaken a vast number of
measures since our record investment of now $5.1 billion, with nearly 3,000
social homes and another thousand under contract and construction. We have put
out a raft of policy measures, boosted land supply and streamlined and cut red
tape with planning reforms. We are seeing all our policy measures have a clear
and real impact. We have seen building approvals rise by 47.7% over the year to
February to 22,000, far outstripping other states. We have housing completions leading the nation, with a 33% jump
on the previous quarter. As we heard from the Deputy Premier, Perth's
rental vacancy rate lifted to 2.5% in March. Remember that two years ago it was
0.7% and that a balanced rental market is from 2.5% to 3.5%. It demonstrates
everything we are doing. All the measures that we are tackling are boosting
housing supply.
What do we
see from the alternative side? I have to say, I had the misfortune of coming
across WA Liberals' TikToks. It is like car crash TV. You look at it and then
you go away. It is like when you have a tooth that you wriggle; it is painful,
but you keep wriggling the tooth. The WA Liberals' TikToks are like watching
very bad television; you know it is bad for your health, but you still watch
it. We saw that the "member for clan"—I should say the member
for Carine—actually went on TikTok and said, "We will cut red tape
so housing is more affordable." He is there targeting young people, saying
he is going to cut red tape to make it more affordable. And this is what I love
about the Liberals, they make these grandiose statements and yet they do the
opposite. The member for Carine, while running in the election, actually
campaigned against density development.
I also note
that his first letter to me—I respect every member in this place who
writes to ministers about the concerns of their local community—on
housing was against a Department of Communities proposal to up zone to R60.
That was his first letter. Now let us be very clear, R60 is not high density by
any means. In fact, it is recognised as the low scale of medium density. He
wrote a letter to me expressing concern about R60, and about the impact on
roads and traffic, with no evidence at all. R60 is three storeys. I want to
make this very clear. Leadership is about taking your community with you. R60
medium density is three storeys. It is about him peddling particular fears, and
that is the truth about the WA Liberals. They are BANANAs. Do members know what
BANANA stands for? I will read it out: build absolutely nothing or anything
near anyone! They are not NIMBYs anymore; they are BANANAs. On one side, they
go to industry and say, "We're going to cut red tape. We're going to make
housing affordable." But on the other side, under the leadership of the Leader
of the Liberals, they oppose more housing, they add more red tape and they work
to people's worst fears about infill and density.
I want to thank the member for his question. As members know, we take the issue
of housing supply very seriously and we have undertaken a vast number of
measures since our record investment of now $5.1 billion, with nearly 3,000
social homes and another thousand under contract and construction. We have put
out a raft of policy measures, boosted land supply and streamlined and cut red
tape with planning reforms. We are seeing all our policy measures have a clear
and real impact. We have seen building approvals rise by 47.7% over the year to
February to 22,000, far outstripping other states. We have housing completions leading the nation, with a 33% jump
on the previous quarter. As we heard from the Deputy Premier, Perth's
rental vacancy rate lifted to 2.5% in March. Remember that two years ago it was
0.7% and that a balanced rental market is from 2.5% to 3.5%. It demonstrates
everything we are doing. All the measures that we are tackling are boosting
housing supply.
What do we
see from the alternative side? I have to say, I had the misfortune of coming
across WA Liberals' TikToks. It is like car crash TV. You look at it and then
you go away. It is like when you have a tooth that you wriggle; it is painful,
but you keep wriggling the tooth. The WA Liberals' TikToks are like watching
very bad television; you know it is bad for your health, but you still watch
it. We saw that the "member for clan"—I should say the member
for Carine—actually went on TikTok and said, "We will cut red tape
so housing is more affordable." He is there targeting young people, saying
he is going to cut red tape to make it more affordable. And this is what I love
about the Liberals, they make these grandiose statements and yet they do the
opposite. The member for Carine, while running in the election, actually
campaigned against density development.
I also note
that his first letter to me—I respect every member in this place who
writes to ministers about the concerns of their local community—on
housing was against a Department of Communities proposal to up zone to R60.
That was his first letter. Now let us be very clear, R60 is not high density by
any means. In fact, it is recognised as the low scale of medium density. He
wrote a letter to me expressing concern about R60, and about the impact on
roads and traffic, with no evidence at all. R60 is three storeys. I want to
make this very clear. Leadership is about taking your community with you. R60
medium density is three storeys. It is about him peddling particular fears, and
that is the truth about the WA Liberals. They are BANANAs. Do members know what
BANANA stands for? I will read it out: build absolutely nothing or anything
near anyone! They are not NIMBYs anymore; they are BANANAs. On one side, they
go to industry and say, "We're going to cut red tape. We're going to make
housing affordable." But on the other side, under the leadership of the Leader
of the Liberals, they oppose more housing, they add more red tape and they work
to people's worst fears about infill and density.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.