❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding the Department of Environment's handling of requests for historical groundwater level data related to KCGM tailings dams, revealing a dispute between the Williamstown Residents Committee and the DoE over data collection and assessment.
AnsweredQoN 2955Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to a letter dated October 4 2005, reference ceo1127/05 signed by D Carew Hopkins, Acting Director General, Department of Environment (DoE) addressed to Chairperson, Williamstown Residents Committee -
(1) Can the Minister indicate the date on which the letter of the August 25 2005, from the Williamstown Residents Committee was first received by the Department?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) Is it correct that the Williamstown Residents Committee wrote to the Chief Executive Officer of the DoE requesting that the Department write to KCGM requesting all of the reports identified in a letter dated August 23 2004, so that the Department would then have historical information on water levels prior to the commencement of any of the tailings dams?
(4) If no to (3), what specifically did the letter state?
(5) Can the Minister explain why the DoE despite both verbal and written requests from the public failed to request all the reports which would have helped to establish the historical groundwater levels prior to the construction of all tailings dams, when the final seepage and groundwater management plan now endorsed by the DoE on September 29 2005, specifically asked them to establish historical groundwater levels?
(6) If no to (5), why not?
(7) Can the Minister identify why the DoE considered that the content of the reports and information requested, listed in the letter dated August 23 2004, addressed to KCGM (copied to the Department) did not help to establish historical groundwater levels?
(8) If no to (7), why not?
(9) Does the DoE still consider that none of these documents requested relate to the establishment of historical groundwater levels?
(10) If yes to (9), why?
(11) Can the Minister state and identify what were the historical groundwater levels in metres below the surface if any, beneath the Fimiston I tailings dam and in close proximity prior to the construction of the dam?
(12) If no to (11), why not?
(13) Can the Minister state and identify what were the historical groundwater levels in metres below the surface if any, beneath the Fimiston II tailings dam and in close proximity prior to the construction of the dam?
(14) If no to (13), why not?
(1) Can the Minister indicate the date on which the letter of the August 25 2005, from the Williamstown Residents Committee was first received by the Department?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) Is it correct that the Williamstown Residents Committee wrote to the Chief Executive Officer of the DoE requesting that the Department write to KCGM requesting all of the reports identified in a letter dated August 23 2004, so that the Department would then have historical information on water levels prior to the commencement of any of the tailings dams?
(4) If no to (3), what specifically did the letter state?
(5) Can the Minister explain why the DoE despite both verbal and written requests from the public failed to request all the reports which would have helped to establish the historical groundwater levels prior to the construction of all tailings dams, when the final seepage and groundwater management plan now endorsed by the DoE on September 29 2005, specifically asked them to establish historical groundwater levels?
(6) If no to (5), why not?
(7) Can the Minister identify why the DoE considered that the content of the reports and information requested, listed in the letter dated August 23 2004, addressed to KCGM (copied to the Department) did not help to establish historical groundwater levels?
(8) If no to (7), why not?
(9) Does the DoE still consider that none of these documents requested relate to the establishment of historical groundwater levels?
(10) If yes to (9), why?
(11) Can the Minister state and identify what were the historical groundwater levels in metres below the surface if any, beneath the Fimiston I tailings dam and in close proximity prior to the construction of the dam?
(12) If no to (11), why not?
(13) Can the Minister state and identify what were the historical groundwater levels in metres below the surface if any, beneath the Fimiston II tailings dam and in close proximity prior to the construction of the dam?
(14) If no to (13), why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
14 March 2006
Responded by
Minister for Education and Training representing the Minister for the Environment
Response time
117 days
The Minister for the Environment; Science has provided the following response: The following information is true as at 20 December 2005. (1) 1 September 2005. (2) Not applicable. (3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
The following information is true as at 20 December 2005. (1) 1 September 2005. (2) Not applicable. (3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(1) 1 September 2005. (2) Not applicable. (3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(2) Not applicable. (3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(14) Not applicable.
The following information is true as at 20 December 2005. (1) 1 September 2005. (2) Not applicable. (3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(1) 1 September 2005. (2) Not applicable. (3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(2) Not applicable. (3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(3) No. (4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(4) The letter stated "We are requesting that the DoE request all of the reports we have requested in our letter dated 23 August 2004, over 1 year ago, so the department will then have historical information on water levels prior to the tailings dams. This information is not for the WRC, but for the department to assess, when the department makes its assessment of KCGM's final GMP." The letter did not say that the reports should be requested in writing. (5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(5) In response to those requests the DoE verbally contacted KCGM to suggest that they provide relevant information to members of the community wherever possible. The DoE considered that this level of action is appropriate given the fact that this matter is primarily between the Williamstown Residents Committee (WRC) and KCGM. The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
The DoE does not routinely review all reference material of every report it receives as this is not practical. For instance the DoE does not consider it necessary at this time to request any of the documentation to which you referred, from KCGM. (6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(6) Not applicable. (7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(7)The Addendum to Notice of Intent and the references within, is a document that is primarily produced for the Department of Industry and Resources (DOIR), who are also involved with the ongoing regulation of the Tailings Storage Facility(TSF). This document was provided as supporting documentation to KCGM's works approval application relating to the height increase of the Fimiston I TSF, however it should not be assumed that the whole document, including references, relates to DoE's core business. The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
The DoE is satisfied that the relevant information was considered as part of the Thompson and Brett Review. The Minister for the Environment considered appeal determinations in light of the recommendations of the Thompson and Brett Review. As a result the DoE is currently implementing these appeal determinations. (8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(8) Not applicable. (9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(9) The DoE never stated that it believes that none of these documents relate to the establishment of historical water levels. The DoE did however state that it did not consider it necessary to obtain all of the material referenced in the NOI when assessing the works approval for a lift to the Fimiston I TSF. It is likely that some of the documents referenced could be useful in determining historical groundwater levels. The issue of historical water levels is being addressed through the Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan. (10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(10) Not applicable. (11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(11) Historical water levels around these operations have not yet been accurately defined. Therefore KCGM are required to establish historical water levels as part of their Seepage and Groundwater Management Plan in accordance with the Minister for the Environment's decision on appeal numbers 276 to 288 of 2003 which states that, "The overall long-term objective of this Plan should be to decrease groundwater levels to historical levels". (12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(12) Not applicable. (13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(13) See answer to question (11). (14) Not applicable.
(14) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.