❓ The WA parliamentary question seeks information on public sector contracts, specifically regarding salary levels, contract rollovers, and performance reviews for employees earning $100,000, $150,000, and $200,000 in 2001 and 2005. The answer provides a breakdown of the number of employees meeting certain criteria.
AnsweredQoN 2866Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
15 March 2006
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Minister for Justice
Response time
127 days
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(1) 2001 2005 a) $100 000 1 9 b) $150 000 None None c) $200 000 None None (2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
a) $100 000 1 9 b) $150 000 None None c) $200 000 None None (2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
b) $150 000 None None c) $200 000 None None (2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
c) $200 000 None None (2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
(2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
(3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
(4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
c) $200 000 1
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(1) 2001 2005 a) $100 000 1 9 b) $150 000 None None c) $200 000 None None (2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
a) $100 000 1 9 b) $150 000 None None c) $200 000 None None (2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
b) $150 000 None None c) $200 000 None None (2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
c) $200 000 None None (2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
(2) a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
a) $100 000 8 b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
b) $150 000 None c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
c) $200 000 5 (3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
(3) None. (4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
(4) a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
a) $100 000 33 b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
b) $150 000 Not Applicable c) $200 000 1
c) $200 000 1
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.