Hon Nigel Hallett asks about the infill sewerage program's expenditure, regional/metro breakdown, project locations and completion timeline. Hon Kim Chance provides expenditure details for 2006-2010 but lacks information for parts (3) and (4), promising to provide them later.

AnsweredQoN 429Legislative Council
Asked
13 June 2006
Portfolio
Water Resources

QuestionView source ↗

INFILL SEWERAGE PROGRAM
(1) Can the minister please break down the year-by-year estimated expenditure on infill sewerage from 2006 until 2016? (2) From the totals given in (1) for each year, can the minister please detail how much will be spent in regional areas and how much will be spent in metropolitan areas? (3) Can the minister please provide the names of all areas in regional and metropolitan Western Australia that will be receiving infill sewerage, and the year works are expected to be carried out from 2006 until 2016? (4) Could the minister please provide the year that infill sewerage works are expected to be completed in Western Australia, and the expected total cost from 2006 until the year works are completed? Hon KIM CHANCE

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) State government budgeted expenditure is forecast over a four-year period, currently up to 2009-10, while the Water Corporation has an indicative budget for planning infrastructure over a longer time scale. Current budget projections are: 2006-07, $30 million; 2007-08, $20 million; 2008-09, $20 million; 2009-10, $20 million. (2) The answer is in tabular form. I will table the answer and seek leave to have the material incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated - 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
(2) From the totals given in (1) for each year, can the minister please detail how much will be spent in regional areas and how much will be spent in metropolitan areas? (3) Can the minister please provide the names of all areas in regional and metropolitan Western Australia that will be receiving infill sewerage, and the year works are expected to be carried out from 2006 until 2016? (4) Could the minister please provide the year that infill sewerage works are expected to be completed in Western Australia, and the expected total cost from 2006 until the year works are completed? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) State government budgeted expenditure is forecast over a four-year period, currently up to 2009-10, while the Water Corporation has an indicative budget for planning infrastructure over a longer time scale. Current budget projections are: 2006-07, $30 million; 2007-08, $20 million; 2008-09, $20 million; 2009-10, $20 million. (2) The answer is in tabular form. I will table the answer and seek leave to have the material incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated - 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
(3) Can the minister please provide the names of all areas in regional and metropolitan Western Australia that will be receiving infill sewerage, and the year works are expected to be carried out from 2006 until 2016? (4) Could the minister please provide the year that infill sewerage works are expected to be completed in Western Australia, and the expected total cost from 2006 until the year works are completed? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) State government budgeted expenditure is forecast over a four-year period, currently up to 2009-10, while the Water Corporation has an indicative budget for planning infrastructure over a longer time scale. Current budget projections are: 2006-07, $30 million; 2007-08, $20 million; 2008-09, $20 million; 2009-10, $20 million. (2) The answer is in tabular form. I will table the answer and seek leave to have the material incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated - 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
(4) Could the minister please provide the year that infill sewerage works are expected to be completed in Western Australia, and the expected total cost from 2006 until the year works are completed? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) State government budgeted expenditure is forecast over a four-year period, currently up to 2009-10, while the Water Corporation has an indicative budget for planning infrastructure over a longer time scale. Current budget projections are: 2006-07, $30 million; 2007-08, $20 million; 2008-09, $20 million; 2009-10, $20 million. (2) The answer is in tabular form. I will table the answer and seek leave to have the material incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated - 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) State government budgeted expenditure is forecast over a four-year period, currently up to 2009-10, while the Water Corporation has an indicative budget for planning infrastructure over a longer time scale. Current budget projections are: 2006-07, $30 million; 2007-08, $20 million; 2008-09, $20 million; 2009-10, $20 million. (2) The answer is in tabular form. I will table the answer and seek leave to have the material incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated - 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) State government budgeted expenditure is forecast over a four-year period, currently up to 2009-10, while the Water Corporation has an indicative budget for planning infrastructure over a longer time scale. Current budget projections are: 2006-07, $30 million; 2007-08, $20 million; 2008-09, $20 million; 2009-10, $20 million. (2) The answer is in tabular form. I will table the answer and seek leave to have the material incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated - 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
(1) State government budgeted expenditure is forecast over a four-year period, currently up to 2009-10, while the Water Corporation has an indicative budget for planning infrastructure over a longer time scale. Current budget projections are: 2006-07, $30 million; 2007-08, $20 million; 2008-09, $20 million; 2009-10, $20 million. (2) The answer is in tabular form. I will table the answer and seek leave to have the material incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated - 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
(2) The answer is in tabular form. I will table the answer and seek leave to have the material incorporated into Hansard . Leave granted. [See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated - 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
[See paper 1574.] The following material was incorporated -
The following material was incorporated -
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 $M $M $M $M Metropolitan 5.7 4.7 5.0 13.0 Regional 24.3 15.3 15.0 7.0 While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
While I was sure that when I signed off on this answer I had the answer to parts (3) and (4), they do not seem to be in the file, so as those answers become available, I will provide them. [See page 3460.]
[See page 3460.]

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more