❓ Question regarding state government funding for the Surfers Point upgrade, its total cost, responsible parties, funding conditions, and reports of substandard facilities requiring further funding. The Minister provides figures and clarifies oversight, funding conditions and awareness of issues.
AnsweredQoN 731Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
SURFERS POINT
731. Hon ADELE FARINA to the minister representing the
Minister for Regional Development:
I refer to the upgrade of facilities
at Surfers Point.
(1) How much state government
funding was provided for the upgrade of facilities at Surfers Point?
(2) What was the total cost of the
project?
(3) Was the Shire
of Augusta–Margaret River or the South West Development Commission
responsible for the implementation and oversight of the project?
(4) What conditions were placed on
the funding?
(5) It has been
reported that the upgraded facilities are substandard, requiring further
funding to bring the facilities up to standard. How will the replacement
facilities be funded and how much state government finding will be provided?
731. Hon ADELE FARINA to the minister representing the
Minister for Regional Development:
I refer to the upgrade of facilities
at Surfers Point.
(1) How much state government
funding was provided for the upgrade of facilities at Surfers Point?
(2) What was the total cost of the
project?
(3) Was the Shire
of Augusta–Margaret River or the South West Development Commission
responsible for the implementation and oversight of the project?
(4) What conditions were placed on
the funding?
(5) It has been
reported that the upgraded facilities are substandard, requiring further
funding to bring the facilities up to standard. How will the replacement
facilities be funded and how much state government finding will be provided?
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice
of this question.
(1) It was $3 460
000.
(2) It was $5 320
000.
(3) The Shire of
Augusta–Margaret River has oversight of the project.
(4) No special
conditions have been placed on the funding. The recipient is required to meet
the requirements as stipulated by the signed royalties for regions financial
assistance agreement.
(5) Neither the
Department of Regional Development nor the South West Development Commission
has been made aware that the facilities are regarded as substandard.
of this question.
(1) It was $3 460
000.
(2) It was $5 320
000.
(3) The Shire of
Augusta–Margaret River has oversight of the project.
(4) No special
conditions have been placed on the funding. The recipient is required to meet
the requirements as stipulated by the signed royalties for regions financial
assistance agreement.
(5) Neither the
Department of Regional Development nor the South West Development Commission
has been made aware that the facilities are regarded as substandard.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.