❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding a transcript of a Liam Bartlett program, a letter from Neil Winzer concerning public interest disclosures, and alleged cover-ups within public sector agencies. The Deputy Premier claims the matter falls outside their portfolio responsibilities.
AnsweredQoN 2803Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) will the Deputy Premier table a copy of the transcript made of the Liam Bartlett program of 16 March 2004, made by the Government Media Office; (c) will the Deputy Premier confirm that Mr Neil Winzer wrote to him directly on 15 January 2002, because his view (detailed in his letter to the Deputy Premier) was that, the public servants in the Department of Premier and Cabinet represented a block to his open and frank communication with the Premier regarding his (Winzer’s) public interest disclosures; (d) is the Deputy Premier aware of Mr Winzer’s longstanding claims of a cover-up of his public interest disclosures that he has lodged against the Public Sector Management Office, the Public Sector Standards Commission and the Anti Corruption Commission; and (e) in the context of the Liam Bartlett program of 16 March 2004, will the Deputy Premier explain why he has not responded to Mr Winzer’s request of 15 January 2002, for assistance with a path, alternative to the ‘watchdog’ agencies, so that Mr Winzer can proceed with his specified claims?
(c) will the Deputy Premier confirm that Mr Neil Winzer wrote to him directly on 15 January 2002, because his view (detailed in his letter to the Deputy Premier) was that, the public servants in the Department of Premier and Cabinet represented a block to his open and frank communication with the Premier regarding his (Winzer’s) public interest disclosures; (d) is the Deputy Premier aware of Mr Winzer’s longstanding claims of a cover-up of his public interest disclosures that he has lodged against the Public Sector Management Office, the Public Sector Standards Commission and the Anti Corruption Commission; and (e) in the context of the Liam Bartlett program of 16 March 2004, will the Deputy Premier explain why he has not responded to Mr Winzer’s request of 15 January 2002, for assistance with a path, alternative to the ‘watchdog’ agencies, so that Mr Winzer can proceed with his specified claims?
(d) is the Deputy Premier aware of Mr Winzer’s longstanding claims of a cover-up of his public interest disclosures that he has lodged against the Public Sector Management Office, the Public Sector Standards Commission and the Anti Corruption Commission; and (e) in the context of the Liam Bartlett program of 16 March 2004, will the Deputy Premier explain why he has not responded to Mr Winzer’s request of 15 January 2002, for assistance with a path, alternative to the ‘watchdog’ agencies, so that Mr Winzer can proceed with his specified claims?
(e) in the context of the Liam Bartlett program of 16 March 2004, will the Deputy Premier explain why he has not responded to Mr Winzer’s request of 15 January 2002, for assistance with a path, alternative to the ‘watchdog’ agencies, so that Mr Winzer can proceed with his specified claims?
(c) will the Deputy Premier confirm that Mr Neil Winzer wrote to him directly on 15 January 2002, because his view (detailed in his letter to the Deputy Premier) was that, the public servants in the Department of Premier and Cabinet represented a block to his open and frank communication with the Premier regarding his (Winzer’s) public interest disclosures; (d) is the Deputy Premier aware of Mr Winzer’s longstanding claims of a cover-up of his public interest disclosures that he has lodged against the Public Sector Management Office, the Public Sector Standards Commission and the Anti Corruption Commission; and (e) in the context of the Liam Bartlett program of 16 March 2004, will the Deputy Premier explain why he has not responded to Mr Winzer’s request of 15 January 2002, for assistance with a path, alternative to the ‘watchdog’ agencies, so that Mr Winzer can proceed with his specified claims?
(d) is the Deputy Premier aware of Mr Winzer’s longstanding claims of a cover-up of his public interest disclosures that he has lodged against the Public Sector Management Office, the Public Sector Standards Commission and the Anti Corruption Commission; and (e) in the context of the Liam Bartlett program of 16 March 2004, will the Deputy Premier explain why he has not responded to Mr Winzer’s request of 15 January 2002, for assistance with a path, alternative to the ‘watchdog’ agencies, so that Mr Winzer can proceed with his specified claims?
(e) in the context of the Liam Bartlett program of 16 March 2004, will the Deputy Premier explain why he has not responded to Mr Winzer’s request of 15 January 2002, for assistance with a path, alternative to the ‘watchdog’ agencies, so that Mr Winzer can proceed with his specified claims?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
15 June 2004
Response time
42 days
This matter does not fall within my portfolio responsibilities.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.