❓ A WA parliamentary question addresses a property owner's request for government resumption due to the proximity of a rail link. The government declined resumption but agreed to extend a noise wall and explore options to minimize construction impact.
AnsweredQoN 339Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Has the government been requested by the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup to resume his property because the south west metropolitan rail link passes within seven metres of it? (2) If so, when was the request made? (3) Will the government resume the property? (4) If not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(2) If so, when was the request made? (3) Will the government resume the property? (4) If not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(3) Will the government resume the property? (4) If not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(4) If not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(2) If so, when was the request made? (3) Will the government resume the property? (4) If not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(3) Will the government resume the property? (4) If not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(4) If not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(1)-(2) In January 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive, Cooloongup requested that the noise wall on Ennis Avenue be extended beyond Elanora Drive to provide a barrier between his property and the railway. Following representations by the member for Peel, the government agreed that the noise wall would be extended. In February 2005, the owner of 1 Elanora Drive requested that the government resume the property because of the impact on the property of construction work for the southern suburbs railway. (3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
(3)-(4) The alignment of the railway does not require the property to be resumed. The minister has asked the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia to consider ways of minimising the impact of construction on the owner of 1 Elanora Drive. Some options are now being explored.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.