❓ Question on Notice 669 reveals a contentious exchange in WA Parliament where a question directed to the Premier regarding the member for Ballajura was dismissed as a smear and innuendo, leading to interjections and calls for order.
AnsweredQoN 669Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
As a supplementary question, will the Premier now ask the member for Ballajura for an explanation regarding this issue? Dr G.I. GALLOP
AnswerView source ↗
That is pure smear and innuendo, and it does not warrant a response. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order, members!
Dr G.I. GALLOP replied: That is pure smear and innuendo, and it does not warrant a response. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order, members!
That is pure smear and innuendo, and it does not warrant a response. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order, members!
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order, members!
The SPEAKER: Order, members!
Dr G.I. GALLOP replied: That is pure smear and innuendo, and it does not warrant a response. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order, members!
That is pure smear and innuendo, and it does not warrant a response. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order, members!
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER: Order, members!
The SPEAKER: Order, members!
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.