Hon Robin Chapple questions the Minister for State Development regarding the adequacy of answers provided to previous questions (QoN 773) and alleges evasion and potential concealment of improper decisions. The Minister's response refers to previous answers, offers a briefing, and claims the provided answer was clear and relevant.

AnsweredQoN 866Legislative Council
Asked
13 June 2003
Portfolio
State Development

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to question on notice No. 773, May 15 2003 and the answer provided -
(1) Given that the Minister for State Development has not provided clear, concise, relevant and free from argument answers to all the questions 1 to 6 will the Minister now ask the Department to provide clear, concise, relevant and free from argument answers to all of these questions?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) Can the Minister explain why himself and the Department cannot specifically address the concerns I have raised as questions 1 to 6 and provide answers which are on the public record?
(4) If no to (3), why not?
(5) In not providing answers to all of my questions 1 to 6 is the Minister or the Department trying to avoid or concealing improper decisions which may have been made by the Department or the Minister?
(6) If no to (5), why has the Minister deliberately evaded answering all of my questions 1 to 6 on the public record?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
19 August 2003
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for State Development
Response time
67 days
I am advised: (1) Question No. 773 was answered by reference to an answer given to Question No. 772 of 2003. (2) N/A (3) The Honourable member was invited to a briefing by the Department of Industry and Resources to have his concerns addressed. (4) N/A (5) The answer provided attempted to be clear, concise and relevant. If the Honourable member cares to provide advice on what part of the question he did not understand, the Minister will attempt to clarify that matter. (6) N/A
(1) Question No. 773 was answered by reference to an answer given to Question No. 772 of 2003. (2) N/A (3) The Honourable member was invited to a briefing by the Department of Industry and Resources to have his concerns addressed. (4) N/A (5) The answer provided attempted to be clear, concise and relevant. If the Honourable member cares to provide advice on what part of the question he did not understand, the Minister will attempt to clarify that matter. (6) N/A
(2) N/A (3) The Honourable member was invited to a briefing by the Department of Industry and Resources to have his concerns addressed. (4) N/A (5) The answer provided attempted to be clear, concise and relevant. If the Honourable member cares to provide advice on what part of the question he did not understand, the Minister will attempt to clarify that matter. (6) N/A
(3) The Honourable member was invited to a briefing by the Department of Industry and Resources to have his concerns addressed. (4) N/A (5) The answer provided attempted to be clear, concise and relevant. If the Honourable member cares to provide advice on what part of the question he did not understand, the Minister will attempt to clarify that matter. (6) N/A
(4) N/A (5) The answer provided attempted to be clear, concise and relevant. If the Honourable member cares to provide advice on what part of the question he did not understand, the Minister will attempt to clarify that matter. (6) N/A
(5) The answer provided attempted to be clear, concise and relevant. If the Honourable member cares to provide advice on what part of the question he did not understand, the Minister will attempt to clarify that matter. (6) N/A
(6) N/A

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more