Opposition questions the Premier regarding potential taxpayer liability due to a commercial arbitration ruling involving Mineralogy Ltd and a rejected proposal, focusing on potential damages arising from a failure to make a decision.

AnsweredQoN 379Legislative Assembly
Asked
10 June 2014
Portfolio
State Development

QuestionView source ↗

MINERALOGY LTD — COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
379. Mr M. McGOWAN to the Minister for State Development:
Mr M. McGOWAN :
I have a supplementary question. How can the Premier say the arbitratorXXX ###XXXs ruling is a technical ruling when page
50 states that the state will be liable for damages as a consequence of the PremierXXX ###XXXs failure to make a decision? Will the
taxpayers of Western Australia be liable, therefore, for millions or hundreds
of millions of dollars in damages?

AnswerView source ↗

Again, I
repeat: the company concerned has not to this point sought damages; I do not
know whether it will or not. What would the case be that a manifestly
inadequate proposal was rejected on advice, when it should have been assessed
and then rejected? That is the totality of the event.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more