❓ A WA parliamentary question probes the Premier regarding newly discovered documents linked to the late Anthony Lewandowski, specifically concerning a draft affidavit, sketch, and notes potentially implicating Mr. Kucera and Don Hancock. The Leader of the House, represented by Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich, provides no answer.
AnsweredQoN 633Legislative Council
Asked
15 September 2005
Member
Portfolio
Leader of the House representing the Premier
QuestionView source ↗
Notice of my question has been given. I refer to the recently discovered box of documents kept by the late Anthony Lewandowski and ask - (1) What action has the government taken to access and examine the contents? (2) Is the Premier aware that one of the documents is a draft affidavit written by or for Mr Kucera, attached to a hand-drawn sketch of the plan of the Belmont CIB office and notes of events in the handwriting of Don Hancock? (3) Is the Premier concerned about the implications raised by this document, including the implication that Mr Kucera was instructed or coached about his affidavit? (4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
AnswerView source ↗
On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
(1) What action has the government taken to access and examine the contents? (2) Is the Premier aware that one of the documents is a draft affidavit written by or for Mr Kucera, attached to a hand-drawn sketch of the plan of the Belmont CIB office and notes of events in the handwriting of Don Hancock? (3) Is the Premier concerned about the implications raised by this document, including the implication that Mr Kucera was instructed or coached about his affidavit? (4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
(2) Is the Premier aware that one of the documents is a draft affidavit written by or for Mr Kucera, attached to a hand-drawn sketch of the plan of the Belmont CIB office and notes of events in the handwriting of Don Hancock? (3) Is the Premier concerned about the implications raised by this document, including the implication that Mr Kucera was instructed or coached about his affidavit? (4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
(3) Is the Premier concerned about the implications raised by this document, including the implication that Mr Kucera was instructed or coached about his affidavit? (4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
(4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
(1) What action has the government taken to access and examine the contents? (2) Is the Premier aware that one of the documents is a draft affidavit written by or for Mr Kucera, attached to a hand-drawn sketch of the plan of the Belmont CIB office and notes of events in the handwriting of Don Hancock? (3) Is the Premier concerned about the implications raised by this document, including the implication that Mr Kucera was instructed or coached about his affidavit? (4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
(2) Is the Premier aware that one of the documents is a draft affidavit written by or for Mr Kucera, attached to a hand-drawn sketch of the plan of the Belmont CIB office and notes of events in the handwriting of Don Hancock? (3) Is the Premier concerned about the implications raised by this document, including the implication that Mr Kucera was instructed or coached about his affidavit? (4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
(3) Is the Premier concerned about the implications raised by this document, including the implication that Mr Kucera was instructed or coached about his affidavit? (4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
(4) What action has he taken to ascertain from his cabinet minister his explanation of this document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
On behalf of the Leader of the House, I do not have the answer.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.